you just abritrarily redefined globalism to be something that isnt matched by any other definition or practise of globalism ever

-df globalism

whereas i use the standard definition

**globalization**: [In a nutshell], the [integration] and exchange of ideas and goods globally. Hence the name, globalization. It benefits the middle class and especially the rich and powerful, but has hurt the poor and [powerless].
*Question: What Is The Truest Definition Of [Globalization]?

Answer: [Princess Diana's] death.

Question: How come?

Answer: An English princess with an Egyptian boyfriend crashes in a French tunnel, while in a German car with a Dutch engine, driven by a Belgian who was drunk on Scottish whisky, followed closely by Italian Paparazzi on Japanese motorcycles; treated by an American doctor using Brazilian medicines.

This is sent to you by an American, using [Bill Gates's] technology, and you're probably reading this on a computer that uses Taiwanese chips, and a Korean monitor, assembled by Bangladeshi workers in a Singapore plant, transported by Indian lorry-drivers, hijacked by Indonesians, unloaded by Sicilian longshoremen, and trucked to you by Mexican illegals.*
*(<http://globalization.urbanup.com/1181166>)* *9 more results*

The integration of goods and ideas globally

Simple as

you realise integration doesnt have to be 100% and homogenous

Im using the definition that the bot already provides

it doesnt specify that ANYWHERE

you giving me your oil and me giving you my rice is a form of integration you spastic

GG @Green Syndicalism, you just advanced to level 13!

Why would I want your rice when I have oil?

Why tf ae fighting in the Middle East?

because you cant grow rice in your country?

what dumb questions are these?

honestly

Didnt know aussies were such main exporters of rice

Honestly

fuck you are dumb

Im glad im eating aussie rice

$15 an hour is stupid

Yeah, 15 seems a bit low to me as well. In many places, 15 is barely enough to scrape by.

GG @Dr.Cosby, you just advanced to level 2!

Oh yea

Let’s make it 20

No wait

40

No

$60 an hour minimum wage

No

$100 an hour!!!

spastic confirmed

all of us civilised nations have a minimum wage that is indexed to inflation

and you're stuck paying your own people pennies

making them eat shit from the ground and pray for the almighty government to bestow them with supplementary food stamps

Literally, what is the point of a "minimum wage" if it's not enough for people to live a comfortable life?

Everyone has a different perception of what is "comfortable", sure.

But I think it's not so difficult to settle on some common sense metrics (like not working 40+ hours per week, just to make ends meet)

the minimum required to survive based on the cost of living... usually means minimum wage

the living wage is different

Yes, people are prone to take advantage of wiggle room - and people are prone to overspending and living out of their means.