Message from @Sh0t
Discord ID: 634546082399125504
Also feedback mechanisms as in?
in your example there, that' seems hard to deal with now but we've been 'swimming' in a government pool for so long, we forget there are otherways people dealt with stuff like that
Ok I see
So you want self reliance
P much
Saying we are too dependent on government
it's deeper than that, take alternative punishments, like say ostracism
or even how we used ot use torts as our primary enforcement mechanism
I see
the victim is almost totally forgotten onw since the rise of DAs and xyz versus the state
before it was xyz versus abc
even for criminal cases
now the gov siezes your stuff and the police auction it off to fund their parties
before with more common law, trials were all about restitution
So your saying
The real anarchy is the govt
And that govt is masking the people
Which to some extent could be
But which govt auctions peoples stuff
And under what circumstances
well in my head currently, I can think of the actual timeline in the US as this process occured and how it changed society
How. So
in some cases, it was an active push to do it, for specific reasons, one example was dealing with pollution way back when factories started getting popular
used to be it was handled via tort system, the farmer would get injunction to deal with polluting factory
the feedback was direct and close to the victim and abuser
now when have the EPA and many layers of bureaucrats inbetween for same process, unless it's what state defines as blatant, which is not always the case as main reason why teh regulatory state grew was to give big business a cover op
like when the railroads funded the Conservation movement in 1880s
Save the Trees! was really a trick to get the gov to take the land, so the railroads could get free land use
partly why US fedgov owns so much land east of the mississippi river, almost owning entire states like nevada
why the homestead act was ended etc
in the process of doing that, it set into motion many 'tragedies of the commons' where there was no private rationing of resources instead gov would lease XYZ resource, and then every lease-holder had an incentive to use it up as fast as possible while they had the lease. then bureuacratic process and politics became the regulator instead of more natural time-value outlooks you get with say privately owned forests versus gov leased lumber tracts
*snores*
What a snoozer.
?
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 8!
move like a ๐ , move like a ๐,put your hands on your waist
Communism is good. Viva Fidel
doesnโt work okay
Should standard healthcare insurance cover the obese? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrcAD4vZ3iI