On THIS issue, I prefer Aguilar

It's 10x easier in vc.

your entire existence in this discord server is permeated with non stop ad homs

As I showed you screenshots of previously, I have dms in which people have told me they think I’m right, but don’t want to say it in the channel because they don’t want to get bullied by you

yea lets see what they think after today

you have had 0 good arguments

I would love to VC about economics , need push to tlak tho

and you responded to none of my arguments

You economists defend empiricism right this second.

Sounds great

It seems like you’re talking past me

@Dr.Cosby be honest, if you read the whole conversation today, who made the most rational arguments

Again, you’re attacking derivation methods

I went back and read the whole thing, which was painful

I'll go in vc.

yes, if the derivation is false, the curve you get will be false

@Sh0t yea but you read today's argument right

That is still, fundamentally, a methodological argument

yea and your methodology is fucking spastic

I am not making an argument for any methodology.

Get in vc right now you cowards

Please calm down.

yes you are, you claim you can use this methodology for instrumentalist purposes

and i say this is delusional

i started from my last 'post' and then read forward until ig ot to the present

Fuck off @Throttles

I am literally not claiming that.

do you even know what instrumentalism is

define it right now

"In the real world" i think about the problem as a trader, and how people sell the bottom and buy tops, sadly

Yes

so i'm more of a behaviorial economist

financial markets are different from these

Tf. If you're gonna debate like this do it in vc

yes is not a definition

but that's not same thing as doing whole economy models

nice, good to see sophie has to google instrumentalism to figure out what it means

@Throttles fuck off I don’t take orders from Nazis

Green. Calm down.

I like the Systems Thinking approach, whcih is similar to Keen but not quite

which means she claims shes not doing instrumentalism, without knowing what it is