Message from @Throttles
Discord ID: 638751993107841065
but most people agreed with him on neoclassical counterarguments
See how @Sh0t is not spouting ad hominems?
Why don't you guys do this in vc.
you should learn from Sh0t
Sophie I need your feet
you cant exist without ad homs
On THIS issue, I prefer Aguilar
It's 10x easier in vc.
your entire existence in this discord server is permeated with non stop ad homs
As I showed you screenshots of previously, I have dms in which people have told me they think I’m right, but don’t want to say it in the channel because they don’t want to get bullied by you
yea lets see what they think after today
you have had 0 good arguments
I would love to VC about economics , need push to tlak tho
and you responded to none of my arguments
You economists defend empiricism right this second.
Sounds great
It seems like you’re talking past me
@Dr.Cosby be honest, if you read the whole conversation today, who made the most rational arguments
Again, you’re attacking derivation methods
I went back and read the whole thing, which was painful
yes, if the derivation is false, the curve you get will be false
@Sh0t yea but you read today's argument right
That is still, fundamentally, a methodological argument
yea and your methodology is fucking spastic
I am not making an argument for any methodology.
Get in vc right now you cowards
Please calm down.
yes you are, you claim you can use this methodology for instrumentalist purposes
and i say this is delusional
i started from my last 'post' and then read forward until ig ot to the present
Fuck off @Throttles
I am literally not claiming that.
do you even know what instrumentalism is
define it right now
"In the real world" i think about the problem as a trader, and how people sell the bottom and buy tops, sadly
Yes
so i'm more of a behaviorial economist
financial markets are different from these
Tf. If you're gonna debate like this do it in vc
yes is not a definition