@Meerkat_RSA I don't think suzelle is mocking though, she's an entertainer, and the videos I've seen, she's never made the Afrikaner boer look kak. So I'll disagree that she is malicious about her performance.

And that whamen that rolled her eyes, she's just being politically correct, while the coloured man was just being honest and reasonable. Who was that coloured man? Or where can I watch the debate?

@Meerkat_RSA yes but she's still not being malicious about it. If she was being malicious I would agree, but I have yet to see her drag the Afrikaner boer rep through the mud. In fact, from feedback I've seen, people actually love the Afrikaner boer accent because of her.

Ah okay, saw that posted a few times, let me watch that now since you sold me on it.

Agree - Suzelle is cool. People dig that sort of thing.
It's almost flattery because, in a way, you know that the person you are parodying can take a joke and is able to laugh at themselves.

Something that I think most South Africans are fairly good at. Indians loved it when old trevor noah did his indian routines

@Meerkat_RSA jis the first 10min in to this video and I'm Already frustrated with the women, the black and the white one, both of them so far are just irking me with their black people white people finger pointing. I still need to watch the rest, but jeez, the division is very much real, the way they perceive reality is so ignorant... Maybe it's just their emotions getting the better of them.

Let me grind through this😑

haha I feel the same way. The thumbnail alone puts me off.

Okay that coloured guy that came up after the woman, they guy is Shap, mentioning the zebra debate😂 guy is spot on not getting represented, not even the Indians get representation.

And there's the black woman rolling her eyes while he suggests fair representation 😂

This guy is a legend, I want to see him on the live show actually

Yeah, i honestly don't agree with coloureds and Indians being referred to as black, because they technically aren't, but also it's not right to be represented by someone else, especially when they don't have your best interest in mind. That Indian chick that was comsidering herself black and insisting that coloured is a black brother, jeez.. Immediately you see that its setup to be everyone (being black) against whites, she talks about all non whites as brothers and sisters, all but whites. Blatant exclusion, focused on race. Why can't she just say everyone is African, because everyone being white, brown, black and coloured born here is technically African... But no, unity is not on the agenda lol.. Jis this debate frustrates me so much.

so at break point now, next we hear from gardners that face racism... Wonder if they going to include white, coloureds and Indians that also face racism?

At the second break point, they never even talked about gardeners lol.. But joh those emotions. Kinda wish I was there participating, I would have triggered the shit out of people, and probably receive tons of death threats 🙂 lol

Almost done, 20min more

You know..I'm glad that y'all can have difficult discussions and debates like the one the other dude and meerkat posted..the big debate...it's amazing how civil everyone was and for the most part and gave everyone their fair moment to speak (even the older Boer men were given room to speak semi-respectfully (even though the crowd booed at them, as a whole it was pretty respectful) without stomping and interrupting too much....I wish something like this could exist here in America, but the show would just quickly devolve into utter bickering chaos...:(

So, very jealous that y'all even have that sort of show to watch..

Lol I wouldn't say it was all that respectful, it was mostly civil, yes... There was little respect for white people being regarded as belonging, there was little respect towards the Indians and coloureds being denied their identity and replaced by black identity and allowing blacks to represent and speak on their behalf, even though they disagree. And also I think largely that the participants and audience present and allowed to talk was largely predetermined to maintain control over the discussion. If you've seen our parliament footage and what happens there, you can see this isn't really reflective of actual opinions entirely, almost inconsistent with reality to be honest. But hey that's just my observation, and thoughts. I think this conversation could have been far more honest if the right people representing the arguments could have been selected. But anyways.

I struggle to watch those types of debates - so well done for getting through it

I didn't get all the way through it to be honest. Just over 2/3 of it..

its a bit old but still great https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhJWKKBt9hc

<:Hmm:480050565167185920> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBnDWSvaQ1I

That's...so not comforting at all...So, mic off rom now on until I intend to use it.. I'll have to look more into that.. O.O

https://youtu.be/kv8gvXPwWjY

https://youtu.be/TFqyOZVdy-8

Thanks for the suggestion.

Jissss that guy is a fcking genius the way he handles it.

He totally avoids being labelled a conspiracy theorist by playing dumb and pretending not to see the obvious. A conspiracy theorist generally has a narrative driven agenda, thus they give you the theory, provide the evidence, and acknowledge their own evidence without proper peer reviews (because the conspiracy always involves an establishment that handles the reviews and deceivingly hides the truth) , yet he gives the theory, provides the evidence, but does not acknowledge the evidence, and instead has the viewer review and acknowledge the evidence themselves, and because the viewer has no agenda of their own other than witnessing the truth, it's not a conspiracy at all and the viewer doesn't think themselves to be nut jobs, so they can only witness the truth, and openly accept it. Lol

I'm really impressed, good share.

Lol he even felt compelled to comment right after I explained it in comment thread😂

Lol it's pretty cool that you even decided to comment on his video after watching. 😛 ^.^

I drop at least a comment on most videos really unless it's a content creator that drops daily vids, or if its social commentary mostly, I think feedback in some form is necessary for the creator, and sometimes for the viewers that stray from understanding lol like in this case. Only thing I don't do is up vote or down vote videos lol

https://twitter.com/connerhallmark/status/1067629337522823168

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbJ0aAKd0fg

https://youtu.be/t-wFKNy0MZQ O.o 😂

https://youtu.be/Iq7zVOjhXME

https://youtu.be/VZBL6U9nJhs

its like feminism is a cult

it is a cult lol

The video just makes it more apparent

pretty sad shit