Message from @DipDaChip
Discord ID: 608770007601512458
@Deleted User Yes - so, an intelligent viewer is able to separate fact from bias, especially when they consume a wide platform of media and care about fact checking things. The "factuality" of a news source is certainly more important than it's "bias". That said, when news networks have bias that starts to hinge on hysterical propaganda, it's worth pointing out and being leery (Russia Today, Fox News, etc)
Their logic is, you cannot have a different opinion, and if you do, you're wrong and a scum bag.
MY DICK IS HARD
Bill nye 😍
CLIMATE CHANGE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE REVERSED AND COUNTRIES WILL BE UNDERWATER
Not all opinions are created equal.
@Dr.Cosby But what if it's factual?
Every news source criticised Assad for his regime.
Please tell me that doesn't sound fake
MY DUCK HARD
Turned out the UN didn't even send their human rights report to the fucking Syrian government.
btw i found another german @rednaxela
@Snap Oversteer get some help
Shut the hell up nazi thomas the train
Wtf
If it's factual, it's still important to consider the number of *unintelligent* (or perhaps just extremely busy or disinterested?) views who are being brainwashed by the stuff.
@DipDaChip I took cialis and Viagra at once
Where is aunt Voula?
The hell
AUNTIE VOULA
I'm not going to outright dismiss a Fox story - I link their stuff all the time.
<@605823484593176576>
What do y'all think about the electoral college?
How many people have I pinged?
@DipDaChip bro read through the thing don’t just dismiss it
I have a question
What
🤦🏼♂️
GG @DipDaChip, you just advanced to level 2!
Are you able to support women's rights, and not be called a femminist
Yay
<@605823484593176576>