I don't think you do, you just said the president is a monarch despite literally not at all being one

and the funny thing is that, as iirc abraham lincoln's advisor said, while the u.s is an elective monarchy the u.k became a hereditary republic

Cough

it's just nonsensical

GG @Svea Rike, you just advanced to level 1!

🆙 | **Glorious Texan Empire leveled up!**

Constitutionally, the president has unlimited power through executive orders. The only limit to their power is the perception of the courts pretty much.

the u.k has this fucked up fake system of two monarchs and doesn't function properly

@Cobra Commander it's literally what david starkey, the leading historian on the subject, lectures about

laugh til it hurts

Those titties

U think the u.k. Is fucked up?

GG @𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖗𝖔, you just advanced to level 1!

the entire system of u.s is a carbon copy of england

What about Canada my guy

of course u.s.a was created by englishmen who wanted their own england and rights as englishmen

magna carta, provisions of oxford, petition of right, all flow directly into u.s constitution

the u.s constitution is just the english bill of rights

It's quite unlike england.

so they recreated their own english system in the u.s but further democraticsed it

I @WP I mean a lot of stuff was based on it and yeah the people were English but now it's much different and mixed

becuase the u.k has changed, no the u.s

the u.k is very different now, but the u.s is the true continuation of england

the u.s has simply been further democraticsed and rationalised and systematised

but the u.k is just an incoherent mess of politics with no functioning true executive

to paraquote starkey:

The us politics is a big bowl of soup now. A lot of country's are

if you look at the senate it is merely an elective house of lords. to begin with you were indirectly elected, remember the constitution amendment providing for direct election to the senate is only on the eve of the first world war, but if you look at the senators each rejoices in a quasi-noble status of two per two

per state

the kind of duke of minnesota and earl of oregon. they have effectively life tenures. they have, like the british peerage, access to loot and pillage and reward their followers, sometimes they get found out and there are processes, going directly up to the president itself of impeachment, which is taken straight out of the medieval constitution

the process that clinton narrowly escaped of trial before the senate with the lower house acting as prosecutors

British parliament composition wasn't based on population. Like some of their districts only had like 100 people in them.

And many areas had no representation at all

what are the house of represenatives? they are simply the commons of england. their presiding officer is called the speaker just like in u.k parliament

even the administrative officer is the sergeant at arms. why is the u.s lower house run by the sergeant at arms? because the sergeant at arms is the administrative official of the house of cmmons in england since the reign of henry viii

GG @WP, you just advanced to level 4!

we're not looking at how systems are furhter democraticsed but the structure ofthe system

of course originally when u.s was founded it was only white male property owners who could vote

the founders of the u.s were not concerned with democracy, they were concerned with liberty

that's why washington d.c is so beautifully laid out so that you can easily machinegun rampaging mobs from strongpoints

to continue: