Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 651176218896629771
most americans aren't even the type to participate in polls
Show me one.
modern polling is obsolete
people aren't responsive anymore
notice how only old people answer the phones for the most part
people don't do that anymore
but that is why you cross examine their sources to see if anything is fabricated or made up
Pelth, that actually HURTS your case.
If only old people are answering the phone, then old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.
That means that the ACTUAL support for universal background checks would be WAY HIGHER than 90%.
Pelth is the OMEGATROLL
old ladies aren't representative of the u.s. population
Mihaly, propaganda source.
Do you have a source that isn't the NRA?
so because its a source you dont agree with, its propaganda?
same could be said about your harvard source
cant have it both ways, mexican :c
The NRA has a vested interest in not having universal background checks.
Harvard doesn't have a vested interest either way.
background checks are already very common
Harvard is known to push political opinions like anyone else.
Also, if you actually read the damned article you linked, it doesn't prove your case.
1. It doesn't mention any polling data.
2. All that it mentions are two ballot initiatives.
and what are the implication of universal background checks
if you read your article, it didnt prove your case either
did they explain that in their poll
What the article fails to tell you is that roughly half of all people don't vote.
of course not
it even said that the polls could be skewered
because a universal background check could also apply to private gun sales
which nobody supports
So obviously, if only old people are voting, then clearly, yes, the right wing nut job position is the one most likely to pass.
Because old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.
An electoral result is not a reliable indicator of public opinion.
because the left wing vouches for pedophilia, who wouldnt be right wing at this point? :c
good, how about a civil war libtard
The only way it would be a reliable indicator of public opinion would be if we had mandatory, universal voting.
Which we don't have.