Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 651176218896629771


2019-12-02 21:39:08 UTC  

most americans aren't even the type to participate in polls

2019-12-02 21:39:09 UTC  

Show me one.

2019-12-02 21:39:16 UTC  

modern polling is obsolete

2019-12-02 21:39:24 UTC  

people aren't responsive anymore

2019-12-02 21:39:32 UTC  

notice how only old people answer the phones for the most part

2019-12-02 21:39:35 UTC  

people don't do that anymore

2019-12-02 21:39:36 UTC  

but that is why you cross examine their sources to see if anything is fabricated or made up

2019-12-02 21:39:46 UTC  

Pelth, that actually HURTS your case.

2019-12-02 21:39:56 UTC  

If only old people are answering the phone, then old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.

2019-12-02 21:40:10 UTC  

That means that the ACTUAL support for universal background checks would be WAY HIGHER than 90%.

2019-12-02 21:40:11 UTC  

Pelth is the OMEGATROLL

2019-12-02 21:40:28 UTC  

old ladies aren't representative of the u.s. population

2019-12-02 21:40:31 UTC  

Mihaly, propaganda source.

2019-12-02 21:40:35 UTC  

Do you have a source that isn't the NRA?

2019-12-02 21:40:56 UTC  

so because its a source you dont agree with, its propaganda?

2019-12-02 21:41:03 UTC  

same could be said about your harvard source

2019-12-02 21:41:22 UTC  

cant have it both ways, mexican :c

2019-12-02 21:41:38 UTC  

The NRA has a vested interest in not having universal background checks.

2019-12-02 21:41:42 UTC  

Harvard doesn't have a vested interest either way.

2019-12-02 21:41:48 UTC  

thats untrue

2019-12-02 21:41:59 UTC  

background checks are already very common

2019-12-02 21:42:04 UTC  

Harvard is known to push political opinions like anyone else.

2019-12-02 21:42:16 UTC  

Also, if you actually read the damned article you linked, it doesn't prove your case.

2019-12-02 21:42:22 UTC  

1. It doesn't mention any polling data.

2019-12-02 21:42:29 UTC  

2. All that it mentions are two ballot initiatives.

2019-12-02 21:42:31 UTC  

and what are the implication of universal background checks

2019-12-02 21:42:34 UTC  

if you read your article, it didnt prove your case either

2019-12-02 21:42:35 UTC  

did they explain that in their poll

2019-12-02 21:42:36 UTC  

What the article fails to tell you is that roughly half of all people don't vote.

2019-12-02 21:42:37 UTC  

of course not

2019-12-02 21:42:43 UTC  

it even said that the polls could be skewered

2019-12-02 21:42:48 UTC  

because a universal background check could also apply to private gun sales

2019-12-02 21:42:54 UTC  

which nobody supports

2019-12-02 21:42:56 UTC  

So obviously, if only old people are voting, then clearly, yes, the right wing nut job position is the one most likely to pass.

2019-12-02 21:43:03 UTC  

Because old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.

2019-12-02 21:43:26 UTC  

An electoral result is not a reliable indicator of public opinion.

2019-12-02 21:43:32 UTC  

because the left wing vouches for pedophilia, who wouldnt be right wing at this point? :c

2019-12-02 21:43:36 UTC  

good, how about a civil war libtard

2019-12-02 21:43:46 UTC  

The only way it would be a reliable indicator of public opinion would be if we had mandatory, universal voting.

2019-12-02 21:43:48 UTC  

Which we don't have.