No source with the data to back it up so that 90% is just an imaginary percent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_background_check#Public_opinion
yeah, what was the sampling frame
what was the sample size
It lists the poll sources there.
what methods did they use
checks. One explanation is that the NRA only represents about 5 million of the 105 million Americans who own guns, which means they may have a skewed representation of gun owners.
The simple fact is that it ranges anywhere from the high 80s to the low 90s.
because you can really run some incompetent polls
ok good boy
to get the results you want
Pelth, if you disagree with me, then show me even one poll that shows that universal background checks aren't popular.
Go on.
most americans aren't even the type to participate in polls
Show me one.
modern polling is obsolete
people aren't responsive anymore
notice how only old people answer the phones for the most part
people don't do that anymore
but that is why you cross examine their sources to see if anything is fabricated or made up
Pelth, that actually HURTS your case.
If only old people are answering the phone, then old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.
That means that the ACTUAL support for universal background checks would be WAY HIGHER than 90%.
Pelth is the OMEGATROLL
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190813/universal-background-checks-aren-t-as-universally-popular-as-you-ve-been-led-to-believe
old ladies aren't representative of the u.s. population
Mihaly, propaganda source.
Do you have a source that isn't the NRA?
so because its a source you dont agree with, its propaganda?
same could be said about your harvard source
cant have it both ways, mexican :c
The NRA has a vested interest in not having universal background checks.
Harvard doesn't have a vested interest either way.
thats untrue
background checks are already very common
Harvard is known to push political opinions like anyone else.
Also, if you actually read the damned article you linked, it doesn't prove your case.
1. It doesn't mention any polling data.
2. All that it mentions are two ballot initiatives.
and what are the implication of universal background checks
if you read your article, it didnt prove your case either
