This man is spitting straight facts but you guys won't listen

checks. One explanation is that the NRA only represents about 5 million of the 105 million Americans who own guns, which means they may have a skewed representation of gun owners. - your harvard source

You just type NO

Bruh

No source with the data to back it up so that 90% is just an imaginary percent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_background_check#Public_opinion

yeah, what was the sampling frame

what was the sample size

It lists the poll sources there.

what methods did they use

checks. One explanation is that the NRA only represents about 5 million of the 105 million Americans who own guns, which means they may have a skewed representation of gun owners.

The simple fact is that it ranges anywhere from the high 80s to the low 90s.

because you can really run some incompetent polls

ok good boy

to get the results you want

Pelth, if you disagree with me, then show me even one poll that shows that universal background checks aren't popular.

Go on.

most americans aren't even the type to participate in polls

Show me one.

modern polling is obsolete

people aren't responsive anymore

notice how only old people answer the phones for the most part

people don't do that anymore

but that is why you cross examine their sources to see if anything is fabricated or made up

Pelth, that actually HURTS your case.

If only old people are answering the phone, then old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.

That means that the ACTUAL support for universal background checks would be WAY HIGHER than 90%.

Pelth is the OMEGATROLL

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190813/universal-background-checks-aren-t-as-universally-popular-as-you-ve-been-led-to-believe

old ladies aren't representative of the u.s. population

Mihaly, propaganda source.

Do you have a source that isn't the NRA?

so because its a source you dont agree with, its propaganda?

same could be said about your harvard source

cant have it both ways, mexican :c

The NRA has a vested interest in not having universal background checks.

Harvard doesn't have a vested interest either way.

thats untrue

background checks are already very common

Harvard is known to push political opinions like anyone else.

Also, if you actually read the damned article you linked, it doesn't prove your case.