better?

yea

on my part:
delayed comment? yes
important? also yes
necessary? not really

contradictory? yep

raising his kids right

https://www.apnews.com/6655a9f9f2e442c488e7e679673649f1

**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as5g-qqNdOU

I wanted a look at the gas system on the CAL but no one ever shows that

he skip over it?

Yeah he focused on the problems with the BCG as a mass production General Issue firearm

https://wset.com/news/at-the-capitol/gov-northam-announces-gun-control-package-to-be-introduced-in-next-session

And the crime will go up once they take more firearms out of the hands of citizens

He said the package includes measures to
require universal background checks; ***already exists***
establish an Extreme Risk Protective Order; ***aka we can take your guns at any time without a court order***
reinstate Virginia’s One Handgun a Month law;***because everyone knows 2 handguns are required to commit a crime***
prohibit individuals subject to final protective orders from possessing firearms; ***yeah, if someone has a protective order issued by a judge, they shouldn't have access to firearms***
ban assault firearms; ***.....there is no such thing***
prevent children from accessing firearms; ***violating their 2A rights***
and require individuals to report lost or stolen firearms to law enforcement. ***implying they aren't already?***

Lmao, assault firearms are now just any gun with more then ten rounds. A 9mm glock is an assault firearm.

They know they have no merit to their points so they use lies to cloud what they want.

"Don’t panic, the republicans killed all of these bills last year, and will probably do so again this year.

This will be a concern in 2020. We have state wide elections this November. If the Democrats take control of the HoD and Senate, it’s all over. "

"Other lawmakers will patron legislation to ban the sale, purchase, possession, and transport of assault firearms in the Commonwealth.

The bill also modifies the definition of assault firearm to any firearm that is equipped with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition."
Trying to make NY look like a free state I see, @Lagomaster24

The protection orders are a hugely underestimated issue.

They are already a huge source of judicial abuse.

These are rubber stamped en masse.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/letterman-fights-restraining-order/

http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2012/05/restraining-order-abuse-and-vexatious_31.html

It has already been a huge source for violence, because it can often lead to loss of job or restriction of many job opportunities, with very low evidentiary bars. He said, she said is basically enough to surpass the bar of "preponderance of evidence".

I believe that the left will step up handing out such orders to perform targeted disarmaments.

Well...the Nazis did that in the Weimar Republic...

"and require individuals to report lost or stolen firearms to law enforcement. implying they aren't already?"
I recently read regarding such, @taekahn:

__Source__:
http://archive.vn/C2LJM

Unfortunately, that statistic only concerns stolen firearms used in crimes.

Creating a statistic for how many lost & stolen firearms aren't reported to law-enforcement sounds tricky. Regardless of that statistic, forcing gun-owners to report lost or stolen firearms to the state seems asinine.

Currently they're taking the firearms protection shit seriously

But I'm just waiting for it to become lax in CA

If my /employer/ or people who don't know me personally can get one of those "Restraining orders" as they're declared in CA, it'll be a shitshow

@Miss Direction they happen to give a time frame between gun being stolen and the police finding them?

because if a gun was stolen, only to be used then recovered by police in like a 24h time period, then its understandable why they might not be reported. OR if they are stolen while the owner is not around, given that thieves typically wait until owners are gone.

No, @Grenade123: the article offers no time-frame, but the study examined all traces in 2008 (as mentioned in the article). Though, I doubt nearly all of those instances occurred within 24 hours of the firearm’s theft.

it would be an important statistic

If it exists, yes.

since included in that 40% is also relatives and friends who have taken someones gun then go right to committing a crime i imagine.

**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FXt5md6jPk

Yes, anyone who steals a gun & commits a crime with it (& the owner didn’t report the firearm missing) is included, @Grenade123. ;P