No mate if that was the case then Africa would be western.

That makes no sense.

You need that to make sense, but it doesn't.

How does the history of mainland France impact the Congo?

Europeans have been in Africa for centuries, they were influnced by western art and Europeans inposed a societal structure.

Were black people allowed to join these societal structures?

or were they FORCED to?

Because if you want to say that Indians willfully participated in British society in India, you're gonna have to explain Mahatma Ghandi to me.

To a certin extent. After the Bores and English got to know the black they created apartheid.

Nelson Mandella.

What about the terrorist?

The implication you bring up is that, were they not forced to join these societal structures, they would continue to be tribalistic. I don't think you realize the point you're making here is that "the only reason these societal structures existed in these countries is because it was forced upon them", with the implication that otherwise their 'natural state' is to devolve back into tribalistic society.

Unless I'm missing something.

You're mostly correct.

The Tribal culture is what was theirs.

And I know how Aryan is going to connect that

the key aspect is subjugation

Good point Jaden blacks make a society africanized when they take over just look at Haiti, Jamaica and Africa.

There are those willing to adopt another culture, and those that aren't.

Subjugation of a society does not cause those subjugated to magically accept their oppressor's culture.

Just like if Australia were to fall under Sharia Law

and you were to oust that regime

I suggest you read Where black rules white : a journey across and about Hayti. it explains how Haiti was western but when the blacks kick the French out it became africanized. https://archive.org/details/whereblackrulesw00pric

You wouldn't retain sharia law.

Because that doesn't jive with your culture.

Well, because Sharia Law is literally contrary to western culture. It's an objectively worse system, not just culturally but also in function.

Thats a religious thing and most likely not as the balkans have shown.

Western Culture is contrary to tribal culture.

That doesn't mean they're on equal footing in terms of viability.

And that's not to say that all cultures are equal

Right. lol

But that one is theirs

and one isn't.

Why is it theirs?

What is linking them to that culture?

Well, their history.

Cultures that have changed and improved also have history, though.

Even under Roman rule, the jews still maintained their culture underneath

The Balkans were ruled by Turks for centries and when they kick the turks out they become western again.

Did it, now?

yes i want the non white out. Will you help me on this quest?