These people need actual mental help and treatment.
Not to be allowed to mutilate themselves so they can LARP as the other gender, and especially let their children go through the process, which is just plain child abuse.

We don't glorify sociopathy. We don't glorify schizophrenia, we don't glorify those who suffer from psychosis. We *treat* these people, with therapy and medicine and recognize their suffering for what it is.

When someone reaches out for help with their addiction, be it to drugs or alcohol or whatever, we see it for the tragedy that it is and try to help.

Yet when it comes to gender dysphoria, "oh no, there's nothing wrong with you, you're not sick."

"But muh two-spirit. Native Americans believed that there were more than two genders."
Yeah, well, they also believed our universe floated on the back of a giant space turtle.

you mistake their motive

they don't give a rats ass about these people

They care about the fact they view their lives as pointless/virtueless and crap because they haven't needed to earn anything, and they're also too lazy to ACTUALLY go and do something virtueous

So they stick to the desire to show everyone what a "good" person they are, by sticking up to any random minority/person in social need

which then allows them to channel their nasty behaviour because it is in the name of good

The motive is acquiring victim points for handouts.

I wouldn't disagree with that.

some seek to acquire victim points for free stuff, those are leeches

Others do it so that they become part of the "protected" class and can then be monsterous people who act out in "self defense"

I try to avoid making judgments of people's intent. I wouldn't even claim to know someone's heart or mind or their motive, but I most definitely would not be surprised in the slightest if that were the case.

and a majority does it because they see themselves as normal even though they were promised they were special
and since they're normal, one in a sea of typicals, they're nothing noteworthy

So they cling to an identity to define them because they have no definition of their own

You can judge a persons intent on how they present their cause

Yeah, from their words and their actions.

A person who goes to help the poor and then goes to spout about how great they are for doing it, is only doing it for the publicity

A genuine good person would just help out, and at the end of it walk back home and do their own thing again, those are the true good people

Hollywood people are a great example

they do all these "fundraisers" and "benefit" things, and go out and promote causes
Whilst still sipping 300 dollar wine in their million dollar mansions

"We need to let in all these migrants."
They say as they buy their 11'th 20 bedroom mansion and hide behind their security-guarded homes.
While at the same time hiding behind men with guns while espousing how horrible guns are.

in a way, yes

especially the last bit

Nah, I know what you mean lol.
Kind of like how Al Gore goes on about global warming while flying around in his private jet.

yes

the hypocricy of virtue

Like, I would say what and who I've donated to and how much, but I'm not looking for that kind of recognition or approval from people. I even consider mentioning that I do it at all as a form of kind of 'bragging' about it, but I was just bringing it up as an example.

but it pretty much boils down to that you can judge a person by how loudly they announce their actions

But then even saying that I do that in and of itself could be seen as seeking recognition. lol

well its about the validation of it

A person who feels good by doing good won't need recognition because their own actions enrich them (the real heroes)

A person can still DO good but feel good by being recognised for it (that would be me :P)

And then theres people who don't to do genuine good but still want to be recognised as good (virtue signalers)

And people who don't do good and don't wanna be recognised (the people with lives too busy for this sort of virtue-crap)

Yeah.

but the point binding these fake do-gooders together is the fact that they all define themselves by how others see them

so they rabidly try to appear as "good" so that the world sees them as good and they can be happy that they're "good" people

The priorities have shifted from being good to looking good.

well

the priority moved to being "good" rather than being "right"

I think that's more accurate, yeah.

they'd rather be good and live a lie

than not be a good person, but be right, and truthful

I have to admit that I probably struggle with that too.

No one wants to be 'the bad guy', even if they're right.

exactly

but it ultimately is what seperates the men from the boys

The men accept it, and stick to the knowledge they're right
the boys just want to be good and have their parents achnowledge them as "good boys"

thats not to say that you must always be right, thats impossibruu