i told you twice!

Russia had not initiated aggression, hence they were seen as something of unlikely allies at the time
and Russia invading Poland was shoved under "Retaliation for Operation Barbarossa" and "Liberating Poland from the Nazis"

they didn't declare war because why fight two wars when you can end at 1

after WW2 the russians didn't continue their conquest, so they were left at their borders

Jay the USSR wanted to invade Germany so the German invasion was ment to take them out before the USSR could take Germany out.

yes, according to your wikipedia article which itself states is full of plot-holes and unknowns

as i've said, its about as solid a case as the Trump-Russia dossier

Jay What about the USSR invading and occupying Barbarossa, parts Finland and the baltic states?

Aussie, a 'Revisionist' is literally someone who embelishes a story based losely on facts.

basically, what that article told me is that this guy decided to write a story to explain things after the fact, without any real evidence to back it up.

Since he's attributed to this 'Operation Thunderstorm', and there's no other source for it

It's kinda bunk.

Yes and as I've told you these people use Primany sources to prove what they claim so their enemies call them revisionists.

and yet you link us to their 'enemies', instead of primary sources?

sounds pretty revisionist to me.

I suggest you read some of David Irvings work to understand WW2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwFzm6rZH3o&t=3s

ya'll are movin' around too much

stick to one topic, clean it up

You linked to the Operation Thunderstorm bullshit which debunks itself. You linked to Bloody Sunday, which said that Germany was the aggressor

bouncing around just makes you look retarded

You're not proving your point.

You didn't dispute the fact that Russia's armed forces were focused on defending on the Japanese front

which would imply that they were NOT attempting an invasion, further debunking your operation: afternoon shower

he's using that as the reason Hitler invaded first, cuz the Russian western-front would be weak

Yes there were Russian armed forces in the east to stop the Japanes from invading. I don't deny that.

But Rye they were planing to invade Europe.

according to your shoddy wikipedia article

i mean, its synonimous with the Bush invasion of Iraq

"Oh saddam has WMD's, lets invade"

strike first, under the flag of preventing

anyhow, as much fun as this has been

i gotta go have lunch

lol now that you mention it...

and for the record, i think all factions both in WW2 and now are shitty

I knew there was something I didn't like about W.

the patriot act wasn't enough?

and the two wars

its the endless cycle

Bad times (WW2) create strong men,
Strong men create good times (1950-1980),
Good times create weak men(1980-now)
Weak men create bad times(Now-when the paradigm switches)

Oh, no, I'm talking about the direct comparison to hitler.

we just gotta stand our ground for freedom until the shift happens and we can enter a new golden age again

O.P. Restrepo

look at your history

Its a cycle over and over again, every time