Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 446798212083351553
"when we speak of "chemical castration" we refer of the destruction of the T-factories, the testes. In both cases you don't have functioning testes anymore. That is the castration; not the resulting hormonal levels as you framed it. Hence reversed causality on your part"
Sorry, perhaps misspoke. First off, i'm not talking about "chemical castration". Just castration as it refers to testosterone, which is a hormone, which are a chemical substance in our body. Not chemical in the terms of "things not to ingest because they are bad for you" (*cough* tide pod idiots *cough*). So chemical in the bio/chemistry sense, not warning label sense, if that makes ...sense (i need better wording). Now, this relates to my understanding of the original comment "So there's a chemical means of political control?". This is based off a picture posted somewhere above that more masculine men where on the right, and more feminine men where on the left. So, i read "chemical means" as by removing the testes to decrease testosterone and/or increasing the estrogen levels using supplements. Which is chemical so far in as hormones are chemicals (this is still based of if my understanding of bio is correct. i seem to recall them being refereed to as chemical messengers/chemical substances at some point but maybe i'm wrong in that technicality). Also, i may have found my comment that added to the confusion: "damages the production of testosterone, which is chemical" that should read "which is **a** chemical", my bad.
At any rate, i was only trying to help clear up what to me seemed like a misunderstanding of what was meant by the term "chemical means".
wall of text kills Dr.Wol for 1 life
Also, sorry I pissed you off because i didn't mean too. And if it wasn't me that pissed you off but something else going in life, i'm sorry and hope that goes away and stops annoying you
Lowering the level of Testosterone doesn't make men more femine,
It just kills their masculine-?ness?
Making them less prone to alpha-male behaviour
Think of it like a color scheme, If you have 255 Red, 10 Yellowand 0 Blue, your color will jsut be bright red, if you lower the red to say 25, you suddenly get an Orange-ish color
Thats why men with lower testosterone are just less typical alpha behaviour
and Estrogen is to the developing body of a wamen what Testosterone is for a man
Estrogen produces bobs and stuffs, Testosterone chesthair, denser muscles and beard
I'm getting mixed messages in that one
so Trump gave those people back their voice that was taken by the SJW, and put criminals in jail
And thats somehow a lesson to not take away someones 1st amendment?
Oh lord, guys. I need help. I've gone down a Yakko Rabit Hole.
What about the good countires? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3T1lHBBuLA
I've already seen this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIsB8-XWO4Y
Pretty funny how he just froze on this one, like 'You're kidding, right?'
South Africa during and before apartheid was the only first world country in africa. Now it's a third world country. http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/ZAF
Rhodesia wasn't to bad either but wasn't that industrialized and was still better than Zimbabwe.
subjectivity of better or worse
All most every metic you can think of.
Look at the human development index South Africa is ranked 119th and Zimbabwe is ranked 154th.
Socialism is one hell of a drug
i dont actually agree with the standard that "technological and infastructural development is the determinant of good living"
people are animals and i judge them as such
Do you want to live in any Africa country? or do you want to live in a western (white) country?
im european
not african
you wouldent get a jack russle to hunt lions would you? and you wouldent get a masstiff to hunt rabbits
It's a simple question. Would you rather live in a western (white) country or an African country?
id argue there are probably less africans with depression per capita than europeans or americians
But Europeans and Americans can build and maintain good countries.
yes there is some work to do but once we remove the degenerate influences things will get alot better.
you use this word good and i dont think it means what you think it means
We can build and maintain first world countries while blacks can't, it's that simple.
well zimbawe did try but then we fucked them up by the time they reached a feudal state
You put arms and econmic embargoes on Rhodesia and Rhodesia was in the middle of a civil war yet it was still better than Zimbabwe.
Look what the Rhodesians achieved in 90 years.
The Zimbabweans can't even farm beyond the subsistence level.
~~~I would not want to live in any other nation, white or otherwise, than the one I'm presently in.~~~
~~~Everything else, white or otherwise, is going to shit.~~~
Disregard that. I might not be opposed to Japan.