Message from @zutt
Discord ID: 449102866242600981
According to the judge
oh ok
but then there would be a precedent that twitter is a public forum
I think they might come with some sort of guideline for it
and hell will break loose
The way it's framed, it's supposed to only target Trump
Maybe you will be able to set rules of conduct
why I keep calling it an activist judgement
It will require to either be expanded, or revoked.
Either one is going to lead to leftist butthurt
Yeah as i said it will very likely backfire big time
It's a case of the left crafting a weapon, and not considering it's use against them
This is the product of old laws that dont work on the internet
RE: Hate Crime laws and Title IX
IRL u cant block somebody from talking to u
Funny thing is that i agree in principle
There are ways of doing so.
You should have a public forum
I mean if u are in a park and somebody answers to everything u say, u can ignore them but not make them shut up
Sure.
But by giving people the option to block
Twitter gives people agency, establishing that it's NOT an open public space.
That, like in real life, if someone's just taking a shit in your living room, you have the right to kick them out.
u can have a public forum AND more individual agency
Well i take it more as space for comunication with rules set by the politician
is just the way the medium works
If the court is declaring it an open public forum
Then that's news to Twitter.
The IRL equivalent would be headphones that block the voice of a specific person
or something like that
The equivalent is ACTUALLY more like
everyone running around autistically
with pieces of paper
that they scribble their opinions on and shove in people's faces
that's like saying you have the right to see past the scribbles someone's putting in your face.
if u have the tech that allows u to do that
like some futuristic glasses
It's called the block button
I'm summing up twitter with a real world equivalent
also, dear lord what society do we live in?