"information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view."

biased or misleading in nature

I think that you think that people who think like me have to use bad tactics like lies and half truths means we have but don't because we are on the side of truth.

building a wall is based off of speculation, with no evidence showing anything much greater than a fence, which already exists along significant portions of the us boarder.

you use correlation to equal causation.

your typical line of thinking is what made people believe TVs themselves made people fat

You will be biased to towards pro liberalism propaganda. Propaganda isn't a bad thing it just depends on what is being promoted and how.

also is lazy, stopping at answers that feel easy, rather than keep digging to the root cause.

I was using the build the wall poster as evidce that there can be good propaganda.

you share much with the judge who wants to ban kitchen knives and liberals that want to ban guns.

Do you think most people keep digging let alone even care about politics most people don't.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/09/18/only-36-percent-of-americans-can-name-the-three-branches-of-government/?utm_term=.bb63104d7823

and so i should listen to the people who stopped digging and just made up answers because it was easy?

People need to be lead by good people insted of bad people.

to some you are good, to others Bernie is good. who gets to decide who these "good people" are?

Most people just care about their jobs, friends and family they don't care about foreign policy, economics, military, ect.

The thing is most people aren't free thinkers they are followers which is how a functioning society just works.

must people are not raised to be free thinkers

that would be dangerous wouldn't it?

You can't have everyone be a artist, poet, ect. It's just the way people are. It doesn't matter if you rase people to be free thinkers becasue most people won't be even if you raise people that way.

Most people just do what everyone else dose and what the leaders of a society say is good.

and how do you determine who are really "free thinkers"

poets and artists are hardly free thinkers.

If you have good people ruling a society most people will be good that's just the way people are.

take some drugs and anyone can write

what is "good"

People who think for themsleves are free thinkers.

good for me can come at the expense of you

so what is good

What creates a working and moral society is good.

that doesn't mean it is good for me

or even my family

Do you want to live in a society which works and is prosperous?

yes, but what you define as "working" can leave me and my family behind.

invading and taking local resources rather than setting down roots and figuring things out was a "working" and sometimes "prosperous" society.... except for those invaded

I think societies should be homogeneous so I don't want to have foreigners in my country and I don't want to expand and invad other countires so what's your point?

that would be require kicking me and my girlfriend out of my current country. Anyone who is "mixed" would no be without a society. THAT is my point

Survival is the most moral thing that any group can do so if they need to take other peoples resources so that they can surive is moral.

its also the lazy route.

i could stop doing work

then just kill everyone around me for "survival"

I think mixed race people should be sterilized.