Most people just care about their jobs, friends and family they don't care about foreign policy, economics, military, ect.

The thing is most people aren't free thinkers they are followers which is how a functioning society just works.

must people are not raised to be free thinkers

that would be dangerous wouldn't it?

You can't have everyone be a artist, poet, ect. It's just the way people are. It doesn't matter if you rase people to be free thinkers becasue most people won't be even if you raise people that way.

Most people just do what everyone else dose and what the leaders of a society say is good.

and how do you determine who are really "free thinkers"

poets and artists are hardly free thinkers.

If you have good people ruling a society most people will be good that's just the way people are.

take some drugs and anyone can write

what is "good"

People who think for themsleves are free thinkers.

good for me can come at the expense of you

so what is good

What creates a working and moral society is good.

that doesn't mean it is good for me

or even my family

Do you want to live in a society which works and is prosperous?

yes, but what you define as "working" can leave me and my family behind.

invading and taking local resources rather than setting down roots and figuring things out was a "working" and sometimes "prosperous" society.... except for those invaded

I think societies should be homogeneous so I don't want to have foreigners in my country and I don't want to expand and invad other countires so what's your point?

that would be require kicking me and my girlfriend out of my current country. Anyone who is "mixed" would no be without a society. THAT is my point

Survival is the most moral thing that any group can do so if they need to take other peoples resources so that they can surive is moral.

its also the lazy route.

i could stop doing work

then just kill everyone around me for "survival"

I think mixed race people should be sterilized.

everyone is mixed race unless you can define how far back you need to go

I mean groups not individuals.

Don't give me that crap mate. You know there are races.

how many are there? where do you determine exactly where they came from? and much "tainted blood" do you need to be considered mixed?

and groups are made of individuals

im mixed, scottish german

you cannot have a forest without trees

Yes there are some edge cases bt that dosen't disprove the concept.

edge cases that are not handled means a flawed design

sometimes it means you need to add, othertimes it is evident of a major flaw

If you can disprove race go right ahead.

if you can define race, go right ahead

you are the one making the claim there is more races than human. Prove to me that an Irish Wheaton Terror and an American Wheaton Terror are not the same species despite different coats and related allele. So me the genetic markets, and how much of them you need to be a specific race. Show me how humans born in russia (which covers a large part of asian), Germany, Nordic countries, and the EU are all the same race despite being wildly different.

The subspeciation of humans. A race is a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as distinct by society.