Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 461473706946985984
And people know that times of hardship or even "siege mentality" is very effective at making people even more closed minded.
Give me a exmple of what yo want working even after people are left to themsleves. I can give you many examples to prove what I am saying but you can't.
Christianity wasn't western at frist but over time it decame more westernized because the followers of that faith were. You see biology is more important then ideology in the long term.
Oh im sorry, its not like I spend every day arguing with strangers about why my genes are superior.
I don't say me genes are superior.
I am sorry, but you sound very confident about what you are saying, but I need to know your thought process that led you to saying why something complex like style of governence is passed down by only genetics
Retention of ideas? Yeah I will believe that.
Grasping new ideas? Sure
Or creating and innovating on existing ones. Sure
aussieAryan's going to revert back to being a criminal worth sending to a penal colony if we don't pressure him, it's in his genetic nature I'm sure
Race is a good metric to measure a nation's exposure.
A nation with alot of races = a nation that is very accepting of other races.
A nation with more homogenity is one that is more traditional.
But not every nation exists in a vaccum.
And people will always fall back to the teachings of their ancestors.
Or what they recall from their own collective identity.
The only way this experiment can work is if we somehow manage to create a completely sealed off environment
Put in some clones. Not even actual babies.
Governence is how the eliet of the society run it. Europeans evolved in Europe for thousands of years while Africans evolved in Africa, Asians in Asia, ect. These enivronment are every different from one another, Europe and north east Asia have harsh winters which selected for genes regarding intelligence because if people weren't smart enough to prepare for the winter they wold die which wasn't a problem in Africa. This lead to whites and Asians being smart enough to create and maintain civilization. I can't say for sure why Asians tend to be more autocratic but their relative isolation lead to them creating their own different types of societies like how isolated peoples tend to create different languages after enough time.
They became isolationist very quickl
And another when they decided to search again.
It was the ideas of the emperor that changed. How does the genetics affect that?
This relative isolation lead to different societes and those different socites lead to those different peoples having differen forms of government which worked for them.
Autocraatic? Then how does that explain the mongols?
They also were very good at spreading their seed, and assimilating other nations.
I told you I don't know why Asians are more autocratic I gess their environment required it.
How about the zulus in africa?
They assimilated them in the sort term. After the Mongols fell their ideas and culture were replaced by others.
They were able to wage war against technologically superior enemies
Because of the death of a leader.
And lost what is your point? @Deleted User
Same with rome
Genes don't determine ability, is what i'm saying
Khan's strategic prowess did not pass down to his sons.
How about Babur and the Mughals?
Yes the Romans were a genetic population on the ethnic level and once the Italians lost alot of that blood they weren't as successful anymore.
They took over delhi, and the rest of north india, while being technologically primitive and numerically smaller
Or because they relied too much on conquest and were running out of land to give to their millitary that wasnt being thinned out by war.
And replacing them with less disciplined barbarians that were paid the same despite being less disciplined which led to the downfall of quality.
Or the death of Julius Ceaser that led to the leaders squabbling over who should be his successor.