Message from @Graylan | gray00
Discord ID: 462666346660888577
ive told you 50 times
you can find the IP address of any node
That doesn't necessarily help.
lmfao
how?
you want facebook to kill people dont you
i guess you do
cuz thats what happens with what you advocate
You are not giving the appearance of a rational person.
@Atkins dont read much?
so you want a centralized power with AI to decide who is good and bad
no. i want decentralized. trustless system, that is transparent. like ipfs
😄
Centralized evil is just as evil as decentralized evil.
This system doesn't help anything.
how is decentralized evil?
how is centralized evil?
evil is a bullshit word
See saying "evil is a bullshit word" makes me think that you are amoral and want this network for evil reasons.
lmfao
wont help anyone
If Catalan can use this network to sidestep a legal block, could not other people do the same? People with goals you think are immoral?
how about those in venezuela who would have starved to death without ipfs?
do you even know about them? have you talk to them
plenty from venezuela are using IPFS , steem, etc.. to eat. feed their family
wont help anyone tho lmfao
Yes, great. What about people using the same tools for evil?
Its the ppl who is responsible not the tools
@Atkins first off, while there are many things that almost everyone believes is wrong, the terms good and evil, moral or immoral are subjective. Your argument is the same argument used against free speech. "Well yeah, government censoring is bad, but i mean, nazis are also just as bad, so lets stick with censoring speech." You will never get rid of pedos. Just because you don't seen them doesn't mean they are not already there. decartelizing won't make there suddenly be more pedos. But they would feel safe enough to be more open about it, meaning you can identify them, and figure out how to deal with them.
<:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>
seems like a poor excuse, since its the swedish team that made it happen 😂
@Grenade123 I generally dislike naïve techno-utopianism that only sees the good uses for new technology without giving any thought to the bad. That attitude has given us plenty of grief in the past, and as technology becomes more and more powerful it'll give us plenty more grief in the future.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't make new technology; that just means we need to design new technology while constantly thinking of how it can be abused.
you will never make a tool that will not be abused
So all attempts to mitigate abuse should be abandoned?
I think he means even if you consider possible means of abuse, people will find NEW ways
^