Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 463465541915639819
We should be focusing on how to enhance humans using AI, as opposed to replacing them with it.
Unfortunately it's too powerful to prevent. It is too incredibly valuable and the first company or government to have one will have a massive advantage.
There's a race already underway towards AGI.
But while that's probably something we have to consider in our lifetimes, I'm more concerned about the next 10 years.
Let's consider what you said earlier
You'd said that the vote might have to be revoked to the 'freeloaders'.
also knowladge... we are already tracked... what you learn can be made measurable... anybody read ready player one? Concept of school is in the right direction just few corrections for making money is needed
I want to be clear that I'm not advocating for removing the vote from anyone.
But it may be necessary, right?
I'm just saying that democracy was only viable in societies where the vast majority were producers and wealth disparity was relatively low.
How do you prevent the monopoly in power from finding a way to cull the 'parasites' to prevent losing power?
Otherwise what you end up with is non-producers voting themselves the wealth of the producers, who obviously will use their relative power and resources to resist, and society breaks down.
You don't.
Either way you go in, it's a huge ethical black hole you don't come back out of.
Yep.
And we have to sort this stuff out right now, because the tech is here.
Self-driving cars and trucks, and Google Duplex are going to basically eliminate humans from tens of millions of jobs in the next ten years.
And in those ten years more tech is going to be created which disrupt more sectors.
And there is political deadlock everywhere.
I have a buddy who works in a call center. That's already an untenable job in a wealthy western country.
As someone who takes pride in work, you're already spelling out nightmare fuel for me...
Work will still exist, but wages are going to go down for everyone in the middle of the IQ distribution.
Like nobody wants to have their arse wiped by a cold metal claw so nurses are still safe.
Speak for yourself
Ditto for therapists and any other job specifically requiring a human touch or human empathy.
heheh
But you're going to have more and more people forced into competing in those sectors so wages are going to go down regardless.
The good news is, is that you can get more nurses, teachers, etc for the same money. So that's an improvement.
Sports will still be safe
and inovations
and op eds
Anything that requires people at the extreme ends of the ability distribution.
As will other branches of entertainment
But if you're not a 130+ IQ person, or a 10/10 model, etc, you're looking at increased competition.
imagine public AI
In fact, without day jobs, these areas would likely thrive.
you make it develope your idea.. and you offer it on the market
This sort of thing would only be remotely possible in a one world government, though, I think...
I think what we're going to see in the near term is increased support for UBI or some sort of income supplementation program like negative income tax, along with societal change taking advantage at the dropping cost of mundane human labor.
i don't think it would be without ai managing all laws and adjusting to basic human rights