But it's really not that different.
As was stated, in an Ancap society, your property isn't defined by you.
It is very different, even to it's core principles.
By the way I've debated plenty of communists who unfortunately denied everything you just defined about communism.
Because it's impossible to defend.
See, that's the thing.
ancom in small groups is just playing Minecraft with your friends
I wasn't defending it.
lol
I was condemning it.
It's so hard to defend they deny what it even is
Well it works best when people have something to unite against.
Then again thats true for people in general.
Don't necessarily need to have everything equal, just sharing enough to be part of the group
Anyways, on the principles of how Ancap and Ancom are completely different.
Communism fails every time it's attempted, and ends in Dictatorship, because it's an attempt at anarchy.
Ancap is based in Consent where Ancom is based in Equity.
interesting
Dictatorship being the first stop in the evolution of the State.
technically wouldn't even need equity to have something considered ancom system
Eventually they're forced to concede the point.
Ancap allows for individuals to fail within it's principles
Ancom doesn't and creates a logistical impossibility
i think communism just fails because it's anti economics
Just can be hard to convive a lot of people to join ancom in large scale without the false promise of equity
It's deeper then that, it's anti reality
Simple economics doesn't equate to a murderous dictatorship regime
There's quite clearly more at play there.
You can have real communism, its just really shitty
well what do you do when black markets arise and people ignore your equality and try to trade freely?
you can either give up and have capitalism, or fight it and start oppressing people for trading
"equality"
You can't sustain communism in a setting larger than, say, a farm.
A single plot of land.
And even then it's only because the whole thing is consentual.
I'd say you can't sustain communism in a setting larger than an ant colony but what do I know
communism would just exile members that don't contribute
If it was bound by an overarching state, yes.
If it wasn't bound to those rules, gulags.
Well when you aren;t contributing the food people stop giving you food
