Am i a complete nut? This is my opinion. I dont hold very much weight in it but here goes: The 1% republicans have staged a coup that inflitrated the Democrats, they spread these crazy ideals to them all about trannies, muslims. Illegal immigration, and the economy. The Democrats fell for it and took the bait. They started preaching this shit on the regular. They call anyone who opposes them as "fascist". To the point it is sickening. Everyone hates these faggots with purple hair as they chant abolish borders and abolish profit. Everyone starts using the term fascist or misrepresentating fascism. To the point that people actually think fascism, or modern fascism is acceptable. Then the 1%er Republicans move in fast, easily winning 2016 presidency and soon the 2018 midterms. Wide spread laws are passed easily that pertain to the economy and immigration reform.

Yes you're a complete nut.

1% does not imply republican.

Plenty of mega-rich support the democrats.

Oi i tried cutting it up but it keeps being too long

And no coup has taken place. This lurch to the far left has been happening for years and years.

Has it though? Ive never been cool with muslims and i was always a leftist

Yes. I went to university in the early 2000s and it was happening then.

"Islamiphobia" has been part of the discussion since the Bush years, yeah

I hate christians as much muslims though lol

It has just gotten steadily worse over time as 1970s far leftists moved up the hierarchy in universities and trained their replacements to be even further left than they are.

Then theyre just doomed to fail.

Now it's almost assembly line.

Good riddance. Maybe im waking up to the political climate we live in

Wait if im woke ill go broke....... fuck

Alexa play pewdiepies latest video

In Berkeley they literally scout junior high schools for candidates for the left-wing indoctrination track. Get them into lefty volunteer organizations, give them scholarships, set them up with mentors in UCLA, and either put them on an education degree track or a law degree track.

From their teenage years to being given a position in a faculty or a law firm.

There's absolutely no way there could possibly be a coup by right-wingers.

The batshit intersectional social justice nonsense is not some trick or ploy by the right. It's part of the overall strategy of the far left.

They need some group to replace the downtrodden industrial proletariat, so they're manufacturing one.

Sleeper agents :^)

The manchurian lefty

Just wanna spew some mumblings into the ether for consideration. If we take the stance of "It is better that ten innocent men suffer than one guilty man escape" can't we then propagate that where most law enforcement happens for everyday people?

The police. Would it be right for the cops to apprehend you for a traffic violation? Would it be right for cops to shoot first and ask questions later? Afterall, better ten jailed/dead criminals than one innocent free/alive.

Was just thinking of this because of Tim's video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbOCFZWXvX0

Ten criminals jailed sounds good until you extrapolate what that kind of system would look like in built on that foundation. Most people in society are innocent, just folk trying to get by and enjoy their life the best they can.

I'll take this one up, @Ashers

Are you in the States?

Nope~

Mm, so there might be a disconnect in describing our justice system.

Hmm? Wait, what did you get from my ramblings? o.O

I'm of the mind of **Innocent until proven Guilty**

I was just trying entertain the opposite and just ramble about how that'd look when extralopated further beyond the "it's just 1 dude vs 10 actual criminals"

Well, Innocent until proven Guilty is one thing in our legal system, in a way.

Our legal system isn't designed to prove 'innocence' though, as the closest thing we get in a court hearing is 'Not Guilty'.

Another feature we have is that we have something of a funnel for the justice system leading to a verdict at the end.

Three are three tiers of criteria we require at different points

~~Reasonable Suspicion~~ Probable Cause > Preponderance of Evidence > Beyond a reasonable doubt

~~'Reasonable suspicion'~~ Probable Cause is the point at which a police officer is permitted to detain and search.

And you'll have to pardon me, the term is Probable Cause.

So, at the point that probable cause is considered, a person may be detained. Witnessing of a traffic violation equates to probable cause for the citation. The standard's a little lower for those sorts of petty msidemeanors.

I suppose if you're taking examples from the media, it's possible to assume matters operate on a 'shoot first, ask questions later' premise, but that's simply not the case.

I guess I'd ask, @Ashers , what exactly was the question you had? It may have gotten lost in the noise a bit... People don't just skip to 'Guilty' because they're apprehended.