If we're only making the left follow their own rules

Then we'll be held to them too

If Cernovich does something that hurts limousine liberals or cuckservatives I'll be happy about it.

That's why we need our own front covering our own principles

Cerno makes it clear why it's fucked up, we convey the alternative with consistency

well yes, you need to stick to your principles, and if one of those principles is being held accountable to your own principles, then you can start holding the left to their own principles while still claiming to follow yours.

To have a gentlemen's agreement you need two gentlemen.

"I believe in your right to say what you want, and i hold myself to that, but if you believe you shouldn't be allowed to say the things you are saying, then you should hold yourself to that standard and censor yourself. I will continue to defend your right to say what you want"

My core principle.

Don't advocate solutions I would not want to be held to.

treat others the way you want to be treated. don't order those under your command to do anything you would not do, etc

"If I were a white male I would want others to tell me how awful my privilege is, and to correct the historical injustices done by my kind by redistributing my wealth and power to the oppressed"

Mine needs better wording for conveyance

But I generally use it for general circumstances.

It's not the wording, it's the metaphysics

I don't advocate targeting based on race or religion

You have an entirely different and incompatible set of first principles.

Lest my race or religion be targeted.

Therefore no matter how you formulate your ideas they will be ineffective against progressives.

Yeah

Progressives control academia, academia controls language

There's the first problem

Quit letting people take language away

Most of the cancerous ideologies come about because someone changed a definition of a word or two.

academia controls language HA

Hell, the negative connotations behind 'liberal' come from people who shunt liberty taking it for their own.

you have never met a southerner apparently

lol

But it holds true for some of the routines like "racism = power + prejudice" "uhh no racism is just prejudice", they tend to win battles like that

"undocumented migrant"

"assault weapon"

"hate speech"

a new one that you'll hear soon is "robust expression"

I'm gonna look up robust expression and be prepared

it'll be used in place of "free speech"

the idea being that even though some speech is banned, what you have left can still be used for "robust expression"

I know its a joke, but that stuff is straight out of 1984 "Newspeak" stuff. Its really hard not to see them using 1984 as a manual.

Here's the kicker, though...

The ones opposing Trump think they're the protagonists in 1984

they don't win these battles because the control academia. Its because they scream the loudest

and the opposition has for too long just ignored them. opting for the "ignore and sometimes say sure" to shut them the hell up