if that happens

I know how much of a shitshow that usually is

i suppose yeah

The question is whether or not Icelandic black women have 4, 5 or even sometimes 6 children all fathered by different fathers none of which know or care about their offspring? It's not just about being born out of wedlock, it's about having both parents or just one.

yea i know samoja

There's no such thing as an Icelandic Black Women, as far as I'm aware

https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/2018/10/09/judge-imposes-22-year-sentence-case-involving-abortion-inducing-drug/1567018002/

What this guy did was wrong, but how can this be considered murder if abortion is not considered murder?

The baby was around a month old.

Violation of bodily autonomy

Maybe so. Definitely a crime...but I'm more so interested in how it could be considered murder if abortion isn't considered murder. Had the woman made the decision herself, even if the guy wanted a kid, she would have been legally allowed.

Tbh this is the real confusing part
"Manishkumar Patel, 45, was convicted in August of attempted first-degree intentional homicide of an unborn child. **His girlfriend didn't ingest the drink**"

How did they find out? Time to look into this shit

It looks like he was charged with a whole fuckton of stuff

But yeah it does seem to undermine the "fetus is not a human" argument a bit

Of course Fetus is a human, there is no magical point where Fetus turns from non human to human, it's just convenient to pretend it's not, just like at one point it was convenient to pretend black people were not human, it's the same shit. If i learned anything about humans it's that they will twist themselves into a knot to justify their actions no matter how abhorrent they may be.

so

it's a medical procedure if a doctor does it, but murder if someone else does it?

if libtards where consistent, he would be charged

with attemted physical assault

Libtards and consistent does not belong together in a sentence.

The furry fandom is the worst example of humans on this planet

To be honest.

I think pedophiles take the cake

I mean like, as shitty as furries are
>they're a product of capitalism
>they're community focused
>they're not wholly uncharitable
>they primarily piss in an ocean of piss

And to be a part of the pedophile community already makes you a criminal

Wanting to bang a cartoon animal isnt

Well it depends on what you mean by pedophile community. If you fiddle a kiddie or trade CP then yes, you're a criminal. However there are also stories of furries boning animals and shit

Yeah yeah and animals like children cant consent.

Its only specific subsets of the community that deserves the ire

The furry one I mean

Im talking cubposting, diapers, and well... other shit thats not specific to just furries.

There are a lot of "sleeper pedos" I suspect, who will only go as far as cartoons ever or who try to block that shit out

Well, one example, I cant recall

Look, furries can be really disgusting, i know there was a furry convention a few years back and they trashed the place so bad nobody wants to host them, i am talking diapers full of shit all over the place, bottles and empty wrappers covering the floot, broken furniture and more, but saying all that just being a furry is not a crime, being a paedophile is.

Some vary popular porn animator (Like divves or Minus8) cant recall admitted he was attracted to kids and is seeking psycaitrist help for it.

Nah Im saying that, the furry community shouldnt be generalized by their most degenerate members.

Because it will devalue the definition of degeneracy.

I wasn't saying they should

I was just saying it wasn't a 100%/0% split

Who is divves or Minus8, never heard of them