Message from @CougarChaser
Discord ID: 502918903547297802
"I don't, but I do"
If I have a contest and you agree to the terms and then complain when you don't get your way, are you not just a sore loser?
wsorry started typing while i had a head thought
Oh ok
i can complain cause i contibuted to the contest
so i get to compalin if i feel i was unfairly judged
Why do you get to complain? You didn't build anything
You participated, you lost
The system worked, it did not go your way
your examples make no sense
If we have a contest for say, a cash prize, and you win, and I start bitching about it, I'm just being a sore loser, no?
It's childish behaviour. I knew the results could = my loss
and you didnt explain the extent of this hypothetical contest
I agreed to lose as well as win
It doesn't matter, it's just a contest
and taking it way off topic
It's 100% on topic. Do you know what an election is?
A contest
When you vote, you accept Trump winning implicitly
That is one of the results of the election
You willingly take part knowing that you are participating in a process that could elect Trump
Ergo now that Trump has won, you should have already accepted it
What, that you're a sore loser?
im done you cant see it im dopne explaining it you dont want to se it fine but i tried
No, you've made a series of circular statements and then get mad when I use different examples to explain flaws with that reasoning beyond it simply being circular
no im getting frustrated becuase you are turning this into symantic debate and a circular debate and use some of the wtf examples ive ever seen but its fine agree to disagree
I havent turned this into a semantic debate in the slightest, and I'd love if you could point to where I used a circular argument
Voting for a third party can also be useful in the long run. Winning just 5% of the electorate secures public funding for the next election.
Crypto racist has a nice ring to it.
They're not really crypto-, though.
But it sounds cool
hey guys you know the 4 square political test?
does anybody else feel like it should be working on atleast 3-4 dimensions
sorta asking after discussion with right wing friend who in a geo-political aspect ends up being put as authoritarian typically, but on a personal level is very libertarian
over-complicating needlessly isn't worth a damn, but all the same the test(s) itself misses finer points of ones viewpoints
Might be a matter of changing the questions rather than the layout.
there's sapply for 3 dimensions
and 8values is 4 dimensions
8 values doesnt illustrate my political leaning via hypercubes tho
well... yeah, we can't perceive hypercubes
Maybe you can't