at least u guys have a right to vote

i have a duty to vote

if i dont i can get fined

no matter how utter garbage the candidates are

oz?

i dont get the case you made @Beemann to not vote eqauls right to complain

If I have a contest and you join knowing the terms of the contest, why do you get to complain when it doesn't go your way?

Just sounds like a sore loser tbh

i joined there the reason why i get to

You made a contradictory statement

"I don't, but I do"

If I have a contest and you agree to the terms and then complain when you don't get your way, are you not just a sore loser?

wsorry started typing while i had a head thought

Oh ok

i can complain cause i contibuted to the contest

so i get to compalin if i feel i was unfairly judged

Why do you get to complain? You didn't build anything

You participated, you lost

The system worked, it did not go your way

your examples make no sense

If we have a contest for say, a cash prize, and you win, and I start bitching about it, I'm just being a sore loser, no?

It's childish behaviour. I knew the results could = my loss

and you didnt explain the extent of this hypothetical contest

I agreed to lose as well as win

It doesn't matter, it's just a contest

and taking it way off topic

It's 100% on topic. Do you know what an election is?
A contest

When you vote, you accept Trump winning implicitly

That is one of the results of the election

You willingly take part knowing that you are participating in a process that could elect Trump

and your contest example only helps my point

Ergo now that Trump has won, you should have already accepted it

What, that you're a sore loser?

im done you cant see it im dopne explaining it you dont want to se it fine but i tried

No, you've made a series of circular statements and then get mad when I use different examples to explain flaws with that reasoning beyond it simply being circular

no im getting frustrated becuase you are turning this into symantic debate and a circular debate and use some of the wtf examples ive ever seen but its fine agree to disagree

I havent turned this into a semantic debate in the slightest, and I'd love if you could point to where I used a circular argument

Voting for a third party can also be useful in the long run. Winning just 5% of the electorate secures public funding for the next election.

Crypto racist has a nice ring to it.

They're not really crypto-, though.

But it sounds cool