Message from @Ottobon
Discord ID: 503190010783072279
It's childish behaviour. I knew the results could = my loss
and you didnt explain the extent of this hypothetical contest
I agreed to lose as well as win
It doesn't matter, it's just a contest
and taking it way off topic
It's 100% on topic. Do you know what an election is?
A contest
When you vote, you accept Trump winning implicitly
That is one of the results of the election
You willingly take part knowing that you are participating in a process that could elect Trump
and your contest example only helps my point
Ergo now that Trump has won, you should have already accepted it
What, that you're a sore loser?
im done you cant see it im dopne explaining it you dont want to se it fine but i tried
No, you've made a series of circular statements and then get mad when I use different examples to explain flaws with that reasoning beyond it simply being circular
no im getting frustrated becuase you are turning this into symantic debate and a circular debate and use some of the wtf examples ive ever seen but its fine agree to disagree
I havent turned this into a semantic debate in the slightest, and I'd love if you could point to where I used a circular argument
Voting for a third party can also be useful in the long run. Winning just 5% of the electorate secures public funding for the next election.
Crypto racist has a nice ring to it.
They're not really crypto-, though.
But it sounds cool
does anybody else feel like it should be working on atleast 3-4 dimensions
sorta asking after discussion with right wing friend who in a geo-political aspect ends up being put as authoritarian typically, but on a personal level is very libertarian
over-complicating needlessly isn't worth a damn, but all the same the test(s) itself misses finer points of ones viewpoints
Might be a matter of changing the questions rather than the layout.
there's sapply for 3 dimensions
and 8values is 4 dimensions
8 values doesnt illustrate my political leaning via hypercubes tho
well... yeah, we can't perceive hypercubes
Maybe you can't
D:
):
Yeah, these tests aren't really that good. I think the majority are actually made to be push-polls. Furthermore it's really not obvious that political orientation should exist on any reasonable dimensional space.
Seems to me that you can directly measure the dimensionality of a political test by measuring the independence/orthogonality/correlation between questions.
OK. How do you define orthogonality?
Perpendicular
It's just the collinearity between responses to the test questions.
politiscales is my fave tho
would be cool if we had a channel to post test results, for easy comparison
Is it possible to opt out of discord policy change in regards to class action law suit?
https://twitter.com/BooDooPerson/status/1052922096802848768
if you are in EU area you dont need to do anything.