I disagree with their line of reasoning, but that doesn't make it stupid

there are already alternatives growing

@Beemann its till inconsistent

freedom of association of your property trumps speech

Anti trust laws are not outside the purview of classical liberalism

the real problem is the backbone behind the internet, payment processors and infrastructure coming after new platforms.

politics gey

political ideologies are really vague

you can make your own sites, but you cant just make your own infrastructure

imagine cable coming into your house

what do you mean by infrastructure

"Here is the PC line"

If you want a good understanding of Sargon's positions, without this becoming a giant discussion, read some Hayek

"And here is the free speech line"

I mean infrastructure as in servers, software, cable, ISP's, etc

financial processors

is the infrastructure private property

that depends on where you are

if its is it would be inconsistent to regulate it

if not now its more confusing because government shouldnt own property

Im not in favor of government owned stuff or that

ive just seen 30 years of that BS ending with widespread corruption and monopolies

thats because of government

But there is a problem when you have datacenters, which are used by everyone

no its not

its private property so it should be protected by its rights

no matter how big the market is just placing a value

it would be inconsistent to use force on it

Well these are effectively making it impossible for competition to form.

no

yes

any monopoly in history has failed except by state

im not doubting that

just let the market value things

but you do understand that these companies that do this get government money

stop trying to violate ones rights

thats bad

im not a statist

government should only use force when rights are being violated

it should protect not infringe

And i am saying that datacenters/software devs running them/payment processors