communism is just more altruisitic

anything anyone does for their benefit is evil

a man robbing a bank and a millionaire are both as evil in their eyes

Ah yes, being forced to share is altruistic

@Blackhawk342 the only reasons they are being forced to share is because of the prevalent philosophy

personally nazis are more individualistic but that quickly changes with time

@Blackhawk342 living for others is evil

@Stefan Payne look at china as soon as it started to embrace western values its quality of life raised from people starving all the time to what it is now

its not perfect of course

sargon is retarded change my mind

>prove a negative

@Blackhawk342 hes extremely inconsistent and hops between individualism and collectivism whenever he is challenged

he also calls for government regulation when he says he wants property rights to be protected

>collectivism
When?
>government regulation
Government's purpose is to protect private property

@Beemann no he called for regulating facebook

let me find the video again

no need i know he did

That's because people feel social media is becoming an Oligopoly

The social media isnt the issue

I disagree with their line of reasoning, but that doesn't make it stupid

there are already alternatives growing

@Beemann its till inconsistent

freedom of association of your property trumps speech

Anti trust laws are not outside the purview of classical liberalism

the real problem is the backbone behind the internet, payment processors and infrastructure coming after new platforms.

politics gey

political ideologies are really vague

you can make your own sites, but you cant just make your own infrastructure

imagine cable coming into your house

what do you mean by infrastructure

"Here is the PC line"

If you want a good understanding of Sargon's positions, without this becoming a giant discussion, read some Hayek

"And here is the free speech line"

I mean infrastructure as in servers, software, cable, ISP's, etc

financial processors

is the infrastructure private property

that depends on where you are

if its is it would be inconsistent to regulate it

if not now its more confusing because government shouldnt own property

Im not in favor of government owned stuff or that

ive just seen 30 years of that BS ending with widespread corruption and monopolies