I mean infrastructure as in servers, software, cable, ISP's, etc

financial processors

is the infrastructure private property

that depends on where you are

if its is it would be inconsistent to regulate it

if not now its more confusing because government shouldnt own property

Im not in favor of government owned stuff or that

ive just seen 30 years of that BS ending with widespread corruption and monopolies

thats because of government

But there is a problem when you have datacenters, which are used by everyone

no its not

its private property so it should be protected by its rights

no matter how big the market is just placing a value

it would be inconsistent to use force on it

Well these are effectively making it impossible for competition to form.

no

yes

any monopoly in history has failed except by state

im not doubting that

just let the market value things

but you do understand that these companies that do this get government money

stop trying to violate ones rights

thats bad

im not a statist

government should only use force when rights are being violated

it should protect not infringe

And i am saying that datacenters/software devs running them/payment processors

Are effectively cutting people off the internet

by blocking them in traffic itself

but thats not what sargons saying and as long as governments not involved im fine with that

hes not

but thats what im saying, im saying dont bother with the social media platforms

well I agree

it doesnt matter how censorious they get, people are already leaving them over it anyway

yes its the market speaking

But what is a problem is that said competition is getting cut off at the floor

sure and we need to stop government

ISP's cant do this btw

they cant arbitrarily cut your line because you have unpopular views

But at the datacenter, a software dev like microsoft for example, can just say "we dont want you using your software"

I mean its not the best example because there are alternatives