except they receive plenty of money from governments & state to get them to locate there

well they shouldnt

I already said this

Yes

im not justifying what the government does

one more thing, these social media platforms fall under particular law

but yet choose to operate as publishers

the law doesnt speak for me

same with other tech companies

my ideas are separate from illegal = wrong

Well ironically the way to solve this problem

is by removing the law that protects these places from being sued over banning people

or things being posted there that are unpopular

anything really

they should be able to do that anyway

who should be able to do what

ban people even for no reason unless the contract states other wise

So do you think electricity providors should be able to cut you off the grid over anything you say or do

yes

its their property

So would it be fair to say that you are leaning towards a utopian libertarian free market worldview?

I guess

im a Laissez-faire capitalist

I mean ive grown more libertarian the more authoritarian the EU n shit is getting

Well im fine with most of that

Im just seeing a problem in that what we got isnt capitalist at all

thats the result of collectivism

Most of that is indeed result of government interference, if not all

well im talking about philisophy

Yea i know, im talking about practical reality of today.
We dont need regulations on social media, styx is what i think needs to be done, an internet bill of rights

lul

internet bill of rights is just property rights

Not exactly

ISP's cant cut you off because they dont like what you say using their service

lul

i dont know what ur lulling about

@tritrium how you still wanna violate property rights

You are arguing from an utopian position

regulating the internet just makes thing worse even if we did it now

Corporations regulate the internet right now

which is wrong