Hey, look at that I already covered that when I made my first statement: *a rare scenario for sure, but still.*

Subject a small portion of the population to more problems because of an even smaller subset of that population might cause problems?

Or use my solution which is remove it from IDs entirely

Since it doesn't seem to have a purpose

Not that you necessarily will trust me on this, but no one would mistake me for a man.

I'm your average 50yo female now

@Grenade123 Good luck with that. Even the trans activists don't want that. They want it as an issue to beat people with.

Its the same issue with marriage

Government should get out of it entirely, but no one wanted that

Vote Ben Shaprio in via write in with Dave Rubin as vp. They'll get it done, lol

Yeah as soon as you convince a majority of people to be reasonable

Honestly, my skin in this game is that I don't want to be held with guys if I'm arrested due to a misunderstanding. I have C cups and a vagina. Not a pretty picture.

And guys really wouldn't feel comfortable with me in thier space

Think Blair White or the like

Guys don't feel comfortable with other guys.

I don't think guys in a line up would care

In a jail cell?

A bathroom?

A country that doesn't like trans?

People aren't countries, they're individuals.

Unless you're talking about a country that doesn't like trains. Then I fully understand.

A country that doesn't like trans? Or a country that doesn't like government force being used to force them into a world view?

Where they don't want the government dictating that a church should wed a same sex couple when that is against the congregations beliefs?

Only the worst on the left wants to force a church to wed anyone

If they don't want to wed consanguineous couples they shouldn't have to

If they don't want female priests, they shouldn't have to

The worse on the left makes things difficult

Remember, I'm a libertarian for the most part. If someone doesn't like me, they don't have to relate to me.

Happen with homosexual marriage, it's happening with trans acceptance.

Which is why I never registered as a dem even when they seemed to support most of my positions

I saw them trying to pass laws that forced stuff like that.

I would see stories like "this state shot down gay marriage bill" only to see that the bill would forcr churches to do the wedding.

I fully respect the right of private individuals to discriminate. Churches too. Business *as long as* they don't get big government contracts or provide a basic service required for normal living in a place with few options (i.e. the only grocery store in a small town).

Those asshats in CO that demanded a wedding cake were just that, asshats

Those asshats that want to tell the Catholics to have women priests or the Mormons to marry gays are just that, asshats

Those asshats that want to fine people for calling me "he" *unless they are performing government work* are just that, asshats

And those people who want to tell lesbians that they have to accept a penis in their sex life are worse than asshats. They're evil.

All I ask is that the government operate in a neutral manner and that we have some criteria to permit intersex and truly dedicated trans willing to adapt their anatomy to be where they feel they belong with ID and public spaces.

lets not dismiss the merits of a penis in your life so quickly.

That said, if some lesbians want their pussy church and don't want me in it because I'm not a "woman born" then they can have fun in their little clubhouse

May I be frank?