Message from @AETA
Discord ID: 691448387173613638
the data is more important lol exactly run 50
MULTIPLE articles
where they both contradict each other
It's been proven that nurture means very little with regard to IQ lol
Because it's genetic
Proof?
Why is this a debate
Ok
The rest of the paper is in French, making it hard for me to read it closely, but its summary table (on page 67 and unnumbered) is clear enough: the sample’s mean score on the WISC/WPPSI was 116.6 with a standard deviation of 11.04. The mean VIQ was 110.8 and the mean PIQ was 119.8. Making the same Flynn effect adjustment as for Frydman and Lynn [11] leads to a mean VIQ of 99 and a mean PIQ of 96–100, both less than the Belgian norm. Subtracting an adoptive boost effect would bring them lower.
Ok so the oh so pure white race which I’m guessing you are part of. They sampled iqs in a bunch of European countries which have effectively identical genes and they found 10 point or more differences in iq
It’s due almost entirely to environmental factors
Not genetic factors
Pomp isn't white
lol
lol
You're trying to link race realism to racial supremacy and it's cringe
yes whites scoring higher
than blacks in white households
on average
it says
Under the Scarr and Weinberg st4udy
White is 25
Blacks adopted by whites is
68
and blacks raised by black is
im talking abt iq
29
How do you account for the massive iq differences between the genetically similar European countries
those are all
IQ tests
but they are weighed different
by different studies
mean iq
ya
do u see