According to the Left, I'm a nazi.

According to someone like Dan Harmon.

So, I don't get the equivalency.

Because I don't see people like Crowder, as firm a line as he holds, damning the entire left for pedophilia

hmm..

Well so am I. And according to the right im at least a degenerate if not a pedo. the latter for my stance on censorship primarily

What are teh chances..

my stance being

that if Beto runs..

Trump calls him "Beto the Pedo."

I'd like to reinforce your position, but unfortunately I do favor strict authoritarian government with moral legislation and the repression of freedom, so I think a lot of reasonable people probably feel justified calling me a nazi.

a free speech system needs to be uncensorable enough that you couldnt even remove CP

like blockchains.

You believe a system of free speech needs to allow child pornography?

@Bookworm no, it doesnt need to allow is as there would literaly be no way to stop it

Another problem

You're misusing 'free speech'

@Bookworm if you could stop anything you WILL eventualy stop free speech

So, a system of free speech needs to be unable to stop child pornography.

The ability itself means the system will eventually stop being unrestricted.

Video is more in line with the press, first off.

twitter branded itself as the free speech wing of the free speech party, remember that?

@Bookworm well, CP has been in the bitcoin blockchain for a long ass time now

I'm not sure what that means.

you know there is some text that can be user generated, right? Well, you can encode pictures into ASCII symbols and code that back into a picture.

So, they just hide child pornography in cryptocurrency.

Fiendish.

yeah. And by now we have blockchains for social media. Again files such as pictures would have to be saved in a different manner as you dont typicly want to code something as big as a picture onto the blockchain but itd be entirely possible

Cp gets into some weird territory, I'll gladly debate/discuss in a bit.

it does and it also depends on the definition of porn

First I'll say, no. Defense of CP, WHILE problematic, does not make you a pedo

cause in the US all nudity is somehow seen as pornographic and dads arrested for having a picture of their daughters in the bathtub

Enjoyment does. Making it does.

Sexuality of the content should be a determining factor.

Well making it makes you first and foremost a sexual child abuser and i dont care if you are a pedo or not thats not acceptable

and most sexual child abusers actualy arent pedophile

at least according to the american psychiatric association or my german sources

Could you agree that regulation of CP is a means to inhibit abuse?

That that's the intention, first and foremost?

sure. id argue charging anyone with mere posession is not actualy a means to that (let alone if that includes some teenager that sent a dickpick of himself)

As much as that is clearly pornographic in nature