But I'd argue many of them embrace the term

If they want traditional gender roles with all the violence against women act crap and refusing to this day to let men vote (they can earn the vote by signing up to the draft just like women could vote prior to 1920, it just wasnt enshrined federally or in the UK they could vote just as long as men could if they fulfilled the same conditions EXCEPT being draftable)

well then yeah

Whereas calling someone advocating for minimal government a nazi is strictly untrue

yeah it is untrue

But calling a pedo is typicly untrue. Not neccessarily but typicly

Sure. Who uses that?

And when they then say that pedos should be shot or some such crap... like how authoritarian can you get?

Who calls ALL THE LEFT pedos the same way?

It's false equivalency.

i guess its more limited but what they think is justified by the mental state of someone is preeettty similar

Seriously, though. Who?

I've never heard it.

Doesn't mean it doesn't exist

I believe Steven Crowder takes a very firm stance on pedophiles, but to my knowledge his position is an outlier.

```One side says pedo, the other says nazi is the only difference```

How do you quote like that?

```

Tildes.

Thank you.

Encase it. Two tildes or three. Different effects.

According to the Left, I'm a nazi.

According to someone like Dan Harmon.

So, I don't get the equivalency.

Because I don't see people like Crowder, as firm a line as he holds, damning the entire left for pedophilia

hmm..

Well so am I. And according to the right im at least a degenerate if not a pedo. the latter for my stance on censorship primarily

What are teh chances..

my stance being

that if Beto runs..

Trump calls him "Beto the Pedo."

I'd like to reinforce your position, but unfortunately I do favor strict authoritarian government with moral legislation and the repression of freedom, so I think a lot of reasonable people probably feel justified calling me a nazi.

a free speech system needs to be uncensorable enough that you couldnt even remove CP

like blockchains.

You believe a system of free speech needs to allow child pornography?

@Bookworm no, it doesnt need to allow is as there would literaly be no way to stop it

Another problem

You're misusing 'free speech'

@Bookworm if you could stop anything you WILL eventualy stop free speech

So, a system of free speech needs to be unable to stop child pornography.

The ability itself means the system will eventually stop being unrestricted.