Message from @Coochie coo
Discord ID: 527963415554162698
Or they give up.
That's pretty much how an arms race works...
There are many more factors than that Bookie Boi
im going to say the n word
change my mind
You have no need to
Memes is not a lidget reason
On services (platforms), where is the line for impermissible speech?
Who the fuck knows, and that is the problem
We (my crew) often disclose XSS and other vulnerabikites found in the wild, usually on twitter, of whicever website. And occasionally someone will get picked up and get temp suspension
Trust me, it is insane how the CRTL-Left facists that run these platforms selectively enforce shit
I dont think they're being selective in that case, seems more by chance
and I cant blame them for prohibting coordinated hacking activity on their platform
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2ySC7edHO0 please share with your friends
good luck i suppose, seems tough to show evidence
Please share with a freind and let them know if they have anything please contact the gentleman in the video
Youtuber law is doing a hero's work
Yes he is
Ok wtf
Who did it now
What are my options now. I've been following the patreon debacle from a far...but haven't moved away from it yet. How do I pay you Time?
**Tim
he has like a recurring paypal thing on his website
Yeah, be mindful that you'll lose your rank once you drop your patreon.
as in, IMMEDIATELY.
"Imma fuk u..." -Sexual Harrassment Coochie
@Hops I think he mentioned a direct payment method. Subscribestar *might* pull out of the Great Yeeting? I havent been keeping up
@Timcast sargon lied to everyone he said that patreon did not give him a warning when they did he just did this whole thing for publicity
Im curious, you got evidence?
citations plz
because that'd change... well honestly it would change a large bit, but their banning him is still against their ToS at the time.
and if you're talking about the whole vidcon thing, that was no warning. They call it a warning because apparently "them talking about him" is a warning
even though they agreed he did absolutely nothing wrong.
Pretty sure if Patreon gave him (or others) a warning they would have said as much when discussing the situation.
If that was the case, that chick would have said so.
She didn't. So the truth is somewhere in between
it's more likely patreon is claiming "X = a warning" retroactively.
because we know they're already doing that
but more importantly... what if patreon itself isn't ruled by activists, but instead is being pressured by paypal and stripe? We know Paypal threw Jihadhiwatch out because mastercard told them too.
IMHO, the moneylenders look like they're weighing in on the culture war