the most prelevent theory is that neanderthals evolved in the north, humans evolved in the south, as the ice age receided both groups began migrating in the opposite direction until they crossed and now theres some neanderthal dna in humans

```the birthplace of civilization was neither though, the birthplace of civilization was at a river delta somewhere close to the equater```
Yet all the "powerful" civilization were on the northern Hemisphere...

northern hemisphere is anywhere defigned above 0.infinity latatude. egypt and mesopotamia wernt european

I mean the most powerful civilization had to be somewhere

At one point of time that somewhere was China iirc

"powerful" is relitive to time period and some messurement

that messurement changes depending on who you ask

china evolved in basicly one of the most idelic environments on earth

there is no larger area of fertile land and ideal climate on this planet than south west china

Its either in Europe, India, China and that's about it until a couple of years ago

Well the parts of China that are heavily populated.

the only area comparible is about half the size in the us

egypt is not european

mesopatamia is not european

babyleon wasent european, assyria wasent european, persia wasent european

israel wasent european

europe didint arive to the game until after egypt had existed for 4000 years

europe was the last player in the civilization game, anyone who came in later didint do it fast enough by the time europe was taking over the world and burning their citys to the ground for gold

this is personally i dont think civilization is the only factor in inteligence, or atleast citys arnt, i would argue that cities are a result of a society thats able to make a city rather than the city makes the society that can make the city.

so i kinda dont care that europe was last to step up to the plate when it comes to building citys because i dont think that has any signifigant baring on their inteligence

Funny how people ignore the native tribes of the Americas, which were only killed off because they didn't survive their version of the plague.

i actually tend to think that though theres no way to post humeruously messure it now, that native americans were vastly different than africans in cognitive capability dispite very similar cultural apperences. key differences set them appart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0-kYGtyQxA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yYFMZuhFE

if were going to talk about animal inteligence, and humans are animals, then i think these 2 videos are signifigent in the conversation

Is America an empire? What is an empire? Imo it when an oligarchy rule over an ethnically diverse populous

Sweden is an empire?

You think the Swedes are ruling over their ethnic minorities?

Point

Well, is an empire with a rebellion not an empire?

Just because its collapsing doesn't mean its not an empire.... yet. give it a few years and sure.

They are

They rule over the Sami

Tims getting bludgeoned in the comments on his video for the GoFundMe wall campaign, mostly for citing Buzzfeed. All I've read are uncompelling stances against buzzfeed as whole, or stating the alternative non-profit intriduction doesn't qualify as grounds for modifying the original campaign terms. No one seems to want to engage any other substantive details.

i.e. the terms state that a goal of $1bn has to be met to secure all donors contributions be petitioned for actual border efforts. It's still only at $20mn, way short of any campaign goal that would distribute any portion anywhere else other than the GoFundMe holding position

So what's your premise?

Vocal commentors are failing to engage with some of the critical details, even if tim goes through them, to sustain their conclusion on the topic

Ah. Not anything I'd disagree with. :/

I disagree with the angles that a LOT of major commentators take in shit. People concede ground that they shouldn't left and right, and defend shit that they will straight up lose on.

What's your opinion regarding audience reception, specifically? In this case Tims viewers mostly are familiar with him already, and counter the conclusion falling short in taking stock of fundamental details to substantiate it. I see that a lot in live chat and or comments , and less in face to face convo

Substrate it ... "it" being the viewers counter conclusion.

@RyeNorth

@Timcast ancaps oppose lying in the commercial sphere. It's fraud.