Message from @mikeflarkin
Discord ID: 538133340331573250
weasel words
@The Yellow King that was post RNC giving up. They had already lost their candidates, and the Never Trumpers were set in their ways.
As for Bernie, anyone who owns or wishes to run a business and has a good head on their shoulders would vote against him. Neolibs would have to pinch their noses and go with Trump or risk getting dicked over by a guy who thinks businesses should fail before paying less in employee benefits. Dude got rocked by Ted Cruz and a random crowd member. He would have been destroyed lol
The second paragraph is pretty much what ive heard most die hard trumpers complain about whenever the media talks about turmp
though the second to last sentence is reverseed
Normally the right would say that the journalists are trying to make this a major issue
But apparently in this case he thinks is the opposite, that the media is trying to downplay the issue
dont build your dreams that depend on other people until you can build other people that you can depend on
the one conservative blog i like to go to for their perspective is not happy with national review
Is that the NeverTrumper or was that Weekly Standard
the blog?
the blog is Ace of Spades
I mean National Review
I don't know
Considering the grudge Ace has with them, they might have been Never Trumpers
National Review has a mix at this point. You're probably thinking of Weekly Standard, which was Bill Kristol's magazine and is now dead.
Anyways, the article I posted was positing the reason that the Covington story got as far as it did was a lack of ideological balance in the newsrooms.
I don't think it's a solution on it's own (since the balance of power tends to not be done too well), but it's an interesting point.
@mikeflarkin If the election was today, who would you vote for?
or would you still not vote?
Cool
I voted for Trump because I figured even if he wouldn't or couldn't get it done, at least he was talking about the things we wanted like the wall and ending the shitty trade deals.
Re: Tim's video title question: I don't see any reason why, should a draft exist, anyone of fighting age without a disqualifying physical or mental disability should be excluded. Given that the military has a plethora of positions to fill, not all of them direct combat roles, what's the excuse?
The draft should not exist.
Being an involuntary memeber of the armed forces should be a disqualifying mental disability.
I would agree that a draft should not exist, I'm just asking for consistency
Its ok to be an Individual
nein
Group identity gang
Its great being Me
It is the right of the state to mobilize the individuals within it for defense and the good of the nation.
Truth.
And hey, They fucking wanted equality.
Give it to em.
My great grandfather was a WWII Vet.
Farmer turned into draftee.
>right of the state
I could literally use that for everything else
I just realized something. Didn't Obama cause a shutdown to get funding for Obamacare?
But yeah, I agree that there should never be a Draft.