Yup, no words to describe

holy fuck my eyes

this is a major news organization people

cnn is the new buzzfeed

to top it off, it shows all white hetero couples in the photos

but says its positive among gay men

like wat

BBC male presenters agreed to paycuts

hooookay

wow.. talk about demasculation..

no reward for hard work

I don't see any problem with that?

If they were actually forced into such a thing, sure, that's a problem

people should be paid what they're worth, regardless of other factors

If they want to neuter themselves in the name of equality that’s fine with me (again as long as it’s not forced).

given the amount of them, it probably was a voluntold issue

and oh yeah, I agree, if it was completely voluntary sure

but damn, stick up for yourself

Better than virtue signaling. If you believe something you should act on it.

So I’ll give them credit there.

Sure, to me this is similar to the Mark Wahlberg situation...

well what do you know, sargon covered both the cnn article and the bbc paycuts and came up with the same conclusion

people need not be spineless.

I dont believe this will fix anything whatsoever, you dont appease hitler rule #1

maybe we're getting this all wrong guys

maybe those people asked said "not even once, you're fake news"

and CNN jsut went "So you're saying you want to be cucked"

shit they got us

https://gizmodo.com/sex-researcher-thinks-many-cuck-obsessed-conservatives-1822422097

they even mention how the study was specifically on gay men, and ignore that ala CNN style

Purposely fake news.

Keep it up cnn

"Cuckolding can be positive for some couples, study says."
CNN is a shitty news outlet and lies constantly, study says

the gizmodo comments are cancer

I'm center, center right

I wouldn't ina million years believe that ANY self-respecting man, regardless of his views, would have anything to do with cuckolding

nor would I accuse any segment of the population REGARDLESS of their beliefs of it

they dont, I think gay men are specifically more promiscuous and likely to engage, which is why the lack of separation of terms in this study-review is pretty appalling

agree, but its' being described as basically gospel now

I just don't know where we go from here.. I really don't

and then the researcher himself is saying "well if conservative politicians openly hate on the gays and are sometimes gay themselves, then conservatives who openly show disgust with cuckoldry are likely cucks" makes 0 sense

none whatsoever