depends on what you mean by ineffective

killing jews was an after thought for germany, theres a reason they did most of it all within the last 3 years of the war while the country itself lasted about 18 years before the end of the war

ineffective as in: Costs more money to run, and doesn't innovate as much

have you even seen these tanks? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreuzer_P._1000_Ratte

you mean the one so heavy it got stuck in the mud?

if thats not innovation i dont know waht is

i wouldn't call failed products "innovation"

innovation doesn't include failed products

thats experimentation

well it wasent failed as much as "didint get made"

right, because the King Tiger had its own problems because once you get to a certain size of tank, its weight becomes its worst enemy

Innovation can be defined simply as a "new idea, device or method"

that said, the russians have always been pretty innovative. and get things done with half the tech level

yes, thats the wikipedia 'buzzword' version of it

Just because you can slap a buzzword on something doesn't matter

I've just innovated the toilet! lets have it catapult the poop out a window

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/innovation

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/innovation

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/buzzword

"innovation is often also viewed as the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, unarticulated needs, or existing market needs."

"is often"

i was literally making a joke about stupidly big tanks and your being a pedantic fuck about the word i used

yes, its buzzword term is generally "a new idea"
its application is an idea that improves

welcome to chat messages pal, i can't read intent

dont blame your autism on me bro, we all have to clean our rooms

its called Poe's law

why don't you hobble on down to your socialism spectrum

its clear to me that theres only room for one ism spectrum around here today 😛

ad hominism?

no homi bro

hue hueee 😛

its a bit of a slow week innit?

so i saw a headline that made me laugh. it said that UK and US lawmakers were asking how the facebook data of millions of users got into the hands of the trump campaign. Like why do you need to ask? Facebook sold them that info, thats how they make their money.

I don’t even know who’s side Facebook is on anymore.

Probably just the moneys side.

Facebook is on no one's side.

They're indeed on money's side.

They do whatever is financially expedient.

i would laugh if this made lawmakers make that practice illegal and watch all the free sites go pay to use overnight and how many pissed off people they would have

these are the leaders you expect to do what is in your best interest, and they have no clue how the world works?

these people and Hollywood types. No idea how hte world functions and idiots flock to them to make them kings

its a mix of both

greedy selfish people that want the power and wealth, and tell you what you want to hear (most politicians)
and the people who are too dense to realise they're actually doing more harm (remaining politicians)

and facebook like any company is out for more money, if it benefits the people they'll do it, if it negatively affects the people they'll do it