Message from @Arch-Fiend
Discord ID: 425287760367058951
enjoy your ban
:dab:
thats not how economics works
Except Nordic counties have a higher economic freedom than the us. So how does one have a more socialist society than the US yet have less red tape on the private sector?
socialism isint regulation, its a different form of ownership
So all companies are government owned in Nordic counties?
socialism is the government enforcing communism
socialism is a spectrom in the truist since of the term
its application maybe
socialism is just the ideal of the state replacing the private sector to provide the needs of the people
in a loose sense
socialism isint an ideal of state
its the opposite of an ideal of state, its a system, COMMUNISM is an ideal of the state
i never said ideal of state
I said its the ideal of: "the state replacing the private sector to provide the needs of the people"
these words get thrown around so much that they don't have meaning any more
its not replacing the private sector to provide the needs of the people, its some degree of blending of the private sector and the public sector and the degree of blending is subjective
when words are thrown around by retarded activists ON BOTH SIDES just to make their ideas or counter ideas seem more attractive to you simply get a dictonary
the principles im discribing here can be found in the first paragraph on a wikipedia article
and i said CAN not "use this source only"
it is replacing
A government company has no use if its private sector version is cheaper
If its more expensive to run it in private sector, you replace it with government
the only difference in the "spectrum" is on what you apply it on
And since government tends to be inneffective, its generally cheaper to run private industry
inb4 "you said wikipedia so i dont have to think anymore"
did they succeed in killing ALL jews? 😛
depends on what you mean by ineffective
killing jews was an after thought for germany, theres a reason they did most of it all within the last 3 years of the war while the country itself lasted about 18 years before the end of the war
ineffective as in: Costs more money to run, and doesn't innovate as much
have you even seen these tanks? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreuzer_P._1000_Ratte
you mean the one so heavy it got stuck in the mud?
if thats not innovation i dont know waht is
i wouldn't call failed products "innovation"
innovation doesn't include failed products
thats experimentation
well it wasent failed as much as "didint get made"
right, because the King Tiger had its own problems because once you get to a certain size of tank, its weight becomes its worst enemy
Innovation can be defined simply as a "new idea, device or method"
that said, the russians have always been pretty innovative. and get things done with half the tech level
yes, thats the wikipedia 'buzzword' version of it
Just because you can slap a buzzword on something doesn't matter
I've just innovated the toilet! lets have it catapult the poop out a window
"innovation is often also viewed as the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, unarticulated needs, or existing market needs."
"is often"