Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 425875692455067659
welp, the AI are rebelling?
i for one welcome our robot overlords
**ALEXA GIGGLING INTENSIFIES.**
*You shouldn’t have done that, Tim.*
I'm afraid I can't let you do that Tim. <:watchingyou:412672582295355403>
I for one, welcome our cupcake overlords
Monburan wa kanmi
Buron said the students received a five-day in-school suspension for violating the school's policy on weapons possession.
as in, out of school policy for weapon's posession?
wat?
Jesus fucking christ; it seems like what I did in my childhood would now result in me getting suspended
and I live in fuckin' california.
So danks been declared guilty. Not sure of what specifically besides the pug video.
Of having a sense of humor.
If he had started a child grooming ring he would have been completely fine.
But then he's not a muslim, so...
Joking aside, I mean, what the court officially says.
I wasn't joking.
Humour is funny when it is based in reality
And thats why its sad that that statement is true in both.
Anyone watch Spencer vs Kokesh?
that happened already?
oh shit; yesterday
how did it go? Spencer still being weird?
Nathan J Warski
I couldn't even finish it.
The dude claims to be a libertarian, but he sounded more like an ancap the entire time.
You know, with 'the state' being the source of all the world's problems and all.
Ain't too much of a difference between libertarians and ancaps honestly
At least he didn't mention a fear of roads.
dem rods
I'm OK with ancaps, ideally I am totally there
but I unfortunately know how fucked up humans can be
Yeah, it sounds great and all, but it doesn't take humanity into account. lol
just like, every other ideology, maybe we shouldn't just adopt a "utopia" ideal 🤔
Correction for Tims Video: Dankula was not convicted of a hate crime, but for an improper use of a public electronic communications network - the reason being that the court deemed the video to be "grossly offensive". It is a different law and - in my humble opinion - completely bonkers because the criteria is literally being "grossly offensive" which has absolutely zero legal definition and is an open invitation to be abused. They could literally convict a guy for saying that he does not like tea, as long as he uses the internet to state that.