Message from @JadenFrostwolf
Discord ID: 429914190057308172
and if they're trying to grab something move sideways so that they'd need to take more time to target you
I don't remember all the shit
Point being, at close range even a pistol is not gonna help you.
Until you make space
There are actually training sessions where you utilize semi-automatics and snubnose revolvers in close quarters
and knives too I think
muscle your mammories
even in california knives are only banned in government buildings, and only past 2 inches
never heard of a problem with banks
It would potentially fall under brandishing a weapon laws.
So it's not so much having it in a bank as pulling it out. They could get very upset by that
i think you'd have to unfold it:P i usually have a folder pocket clipped, no way to accidentally take it out
Training video for gun vs knife.
yea i know the tueller drill heh
I wonder why no one asked that dude that said "You can't do that! thats insane" on the knife if: "You're going to tell that to a guy if he's charging at you with a knife to try and kill you?"
I would have replied, "He's right. We should illegalize murder, too."
sad thruth is that they'd prolly be dense enough to say "Thats already illegal"
totally missing your point
these people don't think in logic they think in emotion
which just boils down to "I'm right and we should do what i want because im angry"
Emotion is evil.
Especially with idiots on „the left“ that have a total lack anything even resembling empathy.
Emotion is a motivator,
But just because you're upset doesn't mean you're right, nor should have priority over logic
If you‘re upset and make a decision based on that... you‘re probably wrong.
nah thats not true
If a person swinging a knife, or firing his gun around makes me upset
and i leave the area due to that, its not a wrong idea 😛
but the thing is that is a logical response too
"the left" just doesn't have logic, they just believe that the level of being upset somehow overrides reasoning
I‘m anti gun... not because „think of the children“, but because it is easier to defend yourself from someone who does NOT have a gun... (don’t want to get into it, just an example of logic vs emotion 😉 )and yeah your example is not right because emotion but because logic
I've been over the 'no gun' debate way too many times now to bring forth the typical arguments, myself. lol
the main reasoning behind having guns though,
Is to level the playing field against someone that has more in his arsenal
say you're a scrawny asian woman of 4 ft 5, weighing like 50 kilos
and some 6 ft guy with well over 90 kilos wants to rob you
or someone who has a gun and you're in a locked down area so you can't escape
Well... its better to remove guns from the equation alltogether than to have the bigger arsenal... but again... not going into it now... too much emotion, not enough logic in that topic.
because the issue behind legality of a gun is no concern of a criminal
Norway has gun laws, that didn't stop Anders Breivik from mowing down 40+ children
Except you can't do that. There is no "nobody has guns" option.
it didn't stop those terrorists in france
its like "murder is illegal" too
and i know where you're coming from, i "ideally" wouldn't want guns in a society either,
But since its not impossible to get a gun, realistically i can't have the ideal anymore
Yeah, I would rather they didn't exist.