and conveniently that story never made it to MSM

like the girl who was poisoned is awake right now

has been for a month

i've basically written off any conflict in the middle east area as just more of the same bullshit

russia wasent really involved until recently

you must remimber, staying out of russias shit was why we voted against hillery

it just kind of seems like that didint go anywhere

yes, so now history is going to repeat itself over there?

no, like i just said the world is a different place now

humans don't change

same game, different skin

War has changed.

more players

<:Kappa:327142715592540171>

were in a much higher stress situation than we were with the gulf

its more like korea but not even exactly like that

theres really not actually anything comparible to this i can think of

are you sure about that? are you sure we are in a much higher stress situation than any other time since WW2?

not as bad as the cuban missle crisis

the kind of stress is different, we dont really know what will even happen during a world war with nukes

will they even be used with so much going on at once? we kind of assume they are mutually assured distruction weapons but not nessicaraly in this context would they be

nukes are a bad tactical option for any country to use. I can guarantee the only reason a nuke will be used is in retaliation of another nuke.

sure but they might not be all used

meanwhile, they have a lot of draw backs, including making you the number one enemy of pretty much the world.

i doubt even china would support russia much if they launched nukes first.

we might see something like a blow for blow thing as completely whiping you and your enemy out while other peices are on the board doesent really seem like the best plan

russia wont launch nukes till they are invaded, even then it might not be armagedon

you know, i take it back, russia might use nukes for scorched earth, you are right

they have a habit of doing that

I think as soon as one is launched the game is over.
"The only winning move is to not play in the first place."

so WW3 would be just like every other war. Conventional weaponry, fighting over land

but what would be the goal of such a war?

What happens when one side is on the verge of losing, though? If things did not escalate to nukes up until that point.

thing is if you threaten to take territory that has an icbm on it, they will use it and not lose it, or if you take an important peice of land

nukes might come out then, but like i said, what would be the reason for such a war?

reason isint the reason

all wars usually come down to land someone wants that someone else has

nah not really

thats kind of a liberalist myth

war actually tends to be more of a pride or fear thing

really? you believe these leaders to be that stupid?