Message from @JadenFrostwolf
Discord ID: 432737517251330068
more players
<:Kappa:327142715592540171>
were in a much higher stress situation than we were with the gulf
its more like korea but not even exactly like that
theres really not actually anything comparible to this i can think of
are you sure about that? are you sure we are in a much higher stress situation than any other time since WW2?
not as bad as the cuban missle crisis
the kind of stress is different, we dont really know what will even happen during a world war with nukes
will they even be used with so much going on at once? we kind of assume they are mutually assured distruction weapons but not nessicaraly in this context would they be
nukes are a bad tactical option for any country to use. I can guarantee the only reason a nuke will be used is in retaliation of another nuke.
sure but they might not be all used
meanwhile, they have a lot of draw backs, including making you the number one enemy of pretty much the world.
i doubt even china would support russia much if they launched nukes first.
we might see something like a blow for blow thing as completely whiping you and your enemy out while other peices are on the board doesent really seem like the best plan
russia wont launch nukes till they are invaded, even then it might not be armagedon
you know, i take it back, russia might use nukes for scorched earth, you are right
they have a habit of doing that
I think as soon as one is launched the game is over.
"The only winning move is to not play in the first place."
so WW3 would be just like every other war. Conventional weaponry, fighting over land
but what would be the goal of such a war?
What happens when one side is on the verge of losing, though? If things did not escalate to nukes up until that point.
thing is if you threaten to take territory that has an icbm on it, they will use it and not lose it, or if you take an important peice of land
nukes might come out then, but like i said, what would be the reason for such a war?
reason isint the reason
all wars usually come down to land someone wants that someone else has
nah not really
thats kind of a liberalist myth
war actually tends to be more of a pride or fear thing
really? you believe these leaders to be that stupid?
WW1 lasted so long cause no one wanted to back out once it started
"neighber is getting dangerous, better kill them while im still stronger" "im so powerful i have right to anything i see"
emotions are not stupid, they are aside of inteligence
Yes
caeser was a genius
"im so powerful i have right to anything i see" <- this is a war land someone wants
over land*
its not about the land though, its about the claim
back in the day people would create monuments specificly stating the size of their empire and challanging anyone to rival it
those people dident get empires like that by being fools
but a claim like that isn't starting a war.
ill say were consiterably mild compared to then