So you hire left wingers to say left wing stuff.

same with audiance .. if one is slightly left leaning, a left leaning person will choose it.. but I think its down to the journalists that make the bias grow

Education really.

ANd I mean the public.

You cant expect anyone to voluntarily cut off any further profits they could have potentially earned.

it will be interesting to see how knife media or whateer its called grows

but tbh the more centrist something is, it will be called right wing and left wing

BBC is often called both

thats cuz BBC is government funded, so they are a mouthpiece of whatever political affiliation the government is

the left is always accusing it of right wing bias... and the right even insinuate that its red colouring favours the labour party

funny thing is they're both right this time

Skeptical buch innit?

since the current "conservative" government in britain, is run by a self proclaimed feminist

the current government is centre right wing

#freedankula

but like I said earlier.. less of the half the gov is made up of that party

Feminist, or closet egalitarian?

if i recall correctly, wage-gap prime minister

I would say may is a last generation feminist

not like jesse philips who is an MP for labour

but you see, even a left leading news site stands to gain from reporting on the event. They seem perfectly fine to be tabloid journalists when it comes to their side, all they need to do is find something to use to smear the kids organizing the event, or just link the event to the alt right, and BAM, their view base is spreading shit like crazy in fear

I guess its less about business to the people writing the articles... you would think someone would have a word from higher up

The thing is, I am always under the assumption people operated on greed.

But what Tim says about these journos create the opposite but affirm it as well

yeah but greed for what? greed for themselves? greed for their employers outlet? greed for fame? greed for cash?

Journos who take jobs at a net loss. Write shitty clickbait.

So theres the activism, and they know it gets them clicks.

Problem is, now its a race to see who can write the msot outrageous shit.

And most of them dont want to innovate or change.

I am skeptical of whether they actually believe their own crap or not.

yeah but tabloids have existed for decades... thats not really something new

Except, youd expect their journos to be paid better and arnt uni grads

hang on .. lemme find this prediction from Carl Sagan its really good...

ah.. cant post images... er... lemme see if I can get a link..

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGyRSi0UIAIK58P.jpg:large

We arnt we all guilty?

Twitter, reddit

Id say few can keep concentrated on one thing these days.

Too many distractions and I find it really hard to break the cycle

I think that one line "unable to distinguish between what feels good and whats true"... was bang on

nah, people are perfectly able to distinguish,

They just rather be "good" than "just and true"