Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 441618675779239946
Well i think its a market strategy,
the MSM took one polarized side, in order to get a guaranteed audience that just want to be told things they approve of
so they'll tune in every day, and MSM gets a guaranteed audience to appease their share-holders
but they bet on the wrong horse with the 2016 presidency, and now their grip on the reality they told for years is cracking between their fingers
and they don't want to come out and admit it, cuz then they'd lose their core audience base, and become uncertain, which leads to less ensurance for share-holders etc
meaning they're just slowly and surely going to bleed out
could just be biased journalists
if you start with 2 outlets.. one slightly left leaning.. then a left leaning journalist will go for that outlet - eventually it will get more and more biased naturally
Could be the audience.
Be left wing, left wingers come watch you
So you keep saying left wing, cause if you say anything right wing, they leave
So you hire left wingers to say left wing stuff.
same with audiance .. if one is slightly left leaning, a left leaning person will choose it.. but I think its down to the journalists that make the bias grow
Education really.
ANd I mean the public.
You cant expect anyone to voluntarily cut off any further profits they could have potentially earned.
it will be interesting to see how knife media or whateer its called grows
but tbh the more centrist something is, it will be called right wing and left wing
BBC is often called both
thats cuz BBC is government funded, so they are a mouthpiece of whatever political affiliation the government is
the left is always accusing it of right wing bias... and the right even insinuate that its red colouring favours the labour party
funny thing is they're both right this time
since the current "conservative" government in britain, is run by a self proclaimed feminist
the current government is centre right wing
#freedankula
but like I said earlier.. less of the half the gov is made up of that party
Feminist, or closet egalitarian?
if i recall correctly, wage-gap prime minister
I would say may is a last generation feminist
not like jesse philips who is an MP for labour
but you see, even a left leading news site stands to gain from reporting on the event. They seem perfectly fine to be tabloid journalists when it comes to their side, all they need to do is find something to use to smear the kids organizing the event, or just link the event to the alt right, and BAM, their view base is spreading shit like crazy in fear
I guess its less about business to the people writing the articles... you would think someone would have a word from higher up
The thing is, I am always under the assumption people operated on greed.
But what Tim says about these journos create the opposite but affirm it as well
yeah but greed for what? greed for themselves? greed for their employers outlet? greed for fame? greed for cash?
Journos who take jobs at a net loss. Write shitty clickbait.
So theres the activism, and they know it gets them clicks.
Problem is, now its a race to see who can write the msot outrageous shit.
And most of them dont want to innovate or change.
I am skeptical of whether they actually believe their own crap or not.
yeah but tabloids have existed for decades... thats not really something new
Except, youd expect their journos to be paid better and arnt uni grads