Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 441616002443247626
they don't just "play" victim, they see themselves as a genuine victim
yes
well put
i didnt hear much about this student march which apprently affected 40 states, students walking out of schools in protest
because when they attack someone, they see it as "fighting tyranny"
when they get a response, its the "tyranny oppressing them"
I didn't hear anything about a student march at all, cuz i'm not from the states
something about protecting the 2nd amendment (so Im not surprised it wasnt covered much)
all i hear about America over here is how Trump is a naisie
yeah the twitter and some media went into a bit of meltdown when they announced he was coming here in july
you expect the msm to give a 2nd amendment march airtime like they do gun control?
that would break the narrative that all young people support gun control!
I dont expect it.. but they should
they should, but they don't
you'd think it would sell more headlines
it would be a shocker to their audience
maybe even panic them
and their not target audience would be suprised too
and read
If they were smart, the MSM would report it, to spark the "left"s fear of people doing that, making them protest more, aka more news to cover in the long run
if the MSM was smart, they probably wouldn't be losing out to independent media
Well i think its a market strategy,
the MSM took one polarized side, in order to get a guaranteed audience that just want to be told things they approve of
so they'll tune in every day, and MSM gets a guaranteed audience to appease their share-holders
but they bet on the wrong horse with the 2016 presidency, and now their grip on the reality they told for years is cracking between their fingers
and they don't want to come out and admit it, cuz then they'd lose their core audience base, and become uncertain, which leads to less ensurance for share-holders etc
meaning they're just slowly and surely going to bleed out
could just be biased journalists
if you start with 2 outlets.. one slightly left leaning.. then a left leaning journalist will go for that outlet - eventually it will get more and more biased naturally
Could be the audience.
Be left wing, left wingers come watch you
So you keep saying left wing, cause if you say anything right wing, they leave
So you hire left wingers to say left wing stuff.
same with audiance .. if one is slightly left leaning, a left leaning person will choose it.. but I think its down to the journalists that make the bias grow
Education really.
ANd I mean the public.
You cant expect anyone to voluntarily cut off any further profits they could have potentially earned.
it will be interesting to see how knife media or whateer its called grows
but tbh the more centrist something is, it will be called right wing and left wing
BBC is often called both
thats cuz BBC is government funded, so they are a mouthpiece of whatever political affiliation the government is
the left is always accusing it of right wing bias... and the right even insinuate that its red colouring favours the labour party
funny thing is they're both right this time