Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 441613625388564480
@Timcast
They want safe spaces, for THEM, not the "out" group, aka
"We want to be able to beat people and destroy others stuff, but have our stuff protected by authority"
if its funded by taxes, then its under control of whoever controls the taxes. and who controls the taxes?
government, and government will cater to anyone what offers them a vote
its a rackety
racket
smash and destroy
then scream that they need safe spaces and use themselves as proof
yeah but its different in the UK .. even though one party is "in control" .. the government is also made up of the opposition
they are technically correct about right wing speech inciting violence... their violence
right wing speakers incite the far left to violence
Extremism 101, if you're not with us, you're against us
anyone going to be watching #Farmlands when its out? Im a bit sceptical of LS
@wacka which means both sides can use the threat of removing funding as leverage. and even the opposition is still government. It may work hard, or once worked hard, to limit its bias, but its still under control of a relatively small amount of people who may not even make up its "customers"
@Timcast Its part of a theme with the extremist left. Beating you over the head while crying out you are attacking them.
The extreme/far left doesn't exactly understand what they want themselves though,
They want to punch nazi's, and have safe spaces
They want to take guns away from people and have only the government have guns, the same government they find fascist/tyrannical
They want the rich people to pay everything, most of them are rich/middle class and don't want to chip in their own money
some mentally unstable people do the same: they attack you and when you defend yourself, they start playing the victim
they don't just "play" victim, they see themselves as a genuine victim
yes
well put
i didnt hear much about this student march which apprently affected 40 states, students walking out of schools in protest
because when they attack someone, they see it as "fighting tyranny"
when they get a response, its the "tyranny oppressing them"
I didn't hear anything about a student march at all, cuz i'm not from the states
something about protecting the 2nd amendment (so Im not surprised it wasnt covered much)
all i hear about America over here is how Trump is a naisie
yeah the twitter and some media went into a bit of meltdown when they announced he was coming here in july
you expect the msm to give a 2nd amendment march airtime like they do gun control?
that would break the narrative that all young people support gun control!
I dont expect it.. but they should
they should, but they don't
you'd think it would sell more headlines
it would be a shocker to their audience
maybe even panic them
and their not target audience would be suprised too
and read
If they were smart, the MSM would report it, to spark the "left"s fear of people doing that, making them protest more, aka more news to cover in the long run
if the MSM was smart, they probably wouldn't be losing out to independent media
companies who become ridged do not last the test of time
Well i think its a market strategy,
the MSM took one polarized side, in order to get a guaranteed audience that just want to be told things they approve of
so they'll tune in every day, and MSM gets a guaranteed audience to appease their share-holders
but they bet on the wrong horse with the 2016 presidency, and now their grip on the reality they told for years is cracking between their fingers
and they don't want to come out and admit it, cuz then they'd lose their core audience base, and become uncertain, which leads to less ensurance for share-holders etc
meaning they're just slowly and surely going to bleed out